I've been distracted by revenue production for a couple of months.
Are we expected to upload our packages rebuilt for glibc2.1?
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 07:54:41PM -0500, Phillip R. Jaenke wrote:
I honestly cannot say I have seen a Linux system acting as a fileserver,
or a workgroup server of any sort, in the sense of handling user logins
and home directories, as well as applications.
I have. The trouble is that Samba
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 02:01:00PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
jdk1.132548 Java doesn't work at all for me on slink [0]
(Stephen Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED])
This bug should probably be downgraded. Java works fine without the
named script. I looked into performing an NMU to
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 10:11:54PM -0600, Jonel Rienton wrote:
Slink's latest lprng is broken, it's give me a problem about permission or
something'.
Best to submit a bug. Make sure to make it important.
jdk1.1 works for me on a slink machine. It is true that Java on Debian seems
poorly supported and the maintainers overloaded.
I'll do an NMU to avoid the warning...but only if we (read as Brian)
deem it necessary for release.
The reinstall may coerce some missing files to be properly installed.
It doesn't fix the checkVersions warning. On inspecting the source I
find the script. It claims to be part of the Linux port of the jdk
and not from the sun sources. It is the debian/rules files that
deletes it.
To make the
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:10:46AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 10:45:57PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ pathetic attempt at sex spam snipped ]
Can we PLEASE enforce our spam policy and make these people pay for their
crimes against humanity?
--
I'm working in
In scanning the contents of this file in Incoming, I some mysterious
NULL bytes. Is this intentional?
zless kernel-source-2.2.0_2.2.0-1.diff.gz
8 matches
Mail list logo
