Accepted freebsd-buildutils 10.0-5 (source kfreebsd-amd64 all) into unstable

debian-...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz Description: freebsd-buildutils - Utilities for building FreeBSD sources freebsd-mk - FreeBSD makefile templates for bmake Closes: 758377 Changes: freebsd-buildutils (10.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Petr Salinger

Accepted ufsutils 10.1~svn272500-1 (source) into unstable

Changed-By: Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz Description: ufsutils - UFS filesystems utilities ufsutils-udeb - stripped-down versions of ufsutils, for debian-installer (udeb) Changes: ufsutils (10.1~svn272500-1) unstable; urgency=low . [ Petr Salinger ] * New upstream snapshot of 10.1

Accepted kfreebsd-kernel-headers 10.1~4 (source) into unstable

-...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz Description: kfreebsd-kernel-headers - kFreeBSD headers for development Changes: kfreebsd-kernel-headers (10.1~4) unstable; urgency=low . [ Petr Salinger ] * 000_bruno_haible.diff: update of sys/timex.h: - do not try to support 14

Accepted freebsd-smbfs 10.1~svn272500-1 (source) into unstable

-By: Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz Description: freebsd-smbfs - mount command for the SMB/CIFS filesystem Changes: freebsd-smbfs (10.1~svn272500-1) unstable; urgency=low . [ Petr Salinger ] * New upstream snapshot of 10.1-RC1 . [ Steven Chamberlain ] * Add myself to uploaders

Accepted eglibc 2.17-92 (all amd64 i386 source)

libc6-xen libc0.1-i686 libc0.3-i686 libc0.3-xen libc6.1-alphaev67 libc6-loongson2f libnss-dns-udeb libnss-files-udeb Architecture: all amd64 i386 source Version: 2.17-92 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GNU Libc Maintainers debian-gl...@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Petr Salinger

Re: A few observations about systemd

I think that a clear statement from the kFreeBSD porters about this would help concluding this debate. Does anybody have anything to say about this? I don't think the purpose of your question is concluding the debate, I think it just tries to enforce your point of view by presenting your

Bug#629504: general: Error during compiling kernel module at generating file vnode_if.h.

-I/usr/src/kfreebsd-source-8.1/sys/fs/puffs/puffs/../putter -DPUFFSDEBUG -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -std=iso9899:1999 -c puffs_msgif.c In file included from @/sys/vnode.h:563, from puffs_msgif.c:44: Stop in

Re: Anonymous read-only access and Vcs-* [Re: Alioth status update, take 3]

And while I apologise for the problems we've had with the migration, I'd like to ask people to just accept some of the changes we've made even though you think it makes URLs uglier. They're done to avoid cyclic dependencies between services. Please note, that not only git links are (have

Re: Berkeley DB plan for future

4. Build-Depends - Depends (aka invalid listing in Build-Depends) http://wiki.debian.org/BerkeleyDB/InvalidBuild-Depends Packages in list 4 should be fixed because it means either one of: 1. The Build-Depends listing is erroneous (f.e. upstream dropped support for Berkeley DB) 2. The build

Re: xulrunner, poppler, gnome and gupnp transitions

The webkit #554718 currently on kfreebsd-amd64 blocks building of seed, yelp, gir-repository, gstreamer0.10 (via gir-repository), devhelp, kazehakase, ... For details see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/11/msg00289.html Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Bits from the release team: Release goals, schedule, state of the union

- kFreeBSD: Debian 6.0 Squeeze should be the first Debian release shipping with a non-Linux kernel. Out of curiosity, how is security support working for this and who is providing it? The upstream provides their own security advisories, see http://security.freebsd.org/

Bits from the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD porters

Hello, Debian world! This is a status update for the Debian GNU/FreeBSD port[1]. Compared to previous status mail [2], this port now consists of two architectures: kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64. Currently we focus mainly on kfreebsd-i386. Status -- * We have uptodate toolchain and most

Re: Failed to build openmotif for sparc (Was: Any reason why libmotif3vanished forSparc)

Hi. In fact, there is a successful attempt of package build: http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=openmotif But only alpha, arm, mips and initial i386 version are already in unstable, sparc and powerpc are now in incoming. Regards Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Help: Strange behaviour of ldd

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Petr Salinger wrote: Memory requirement for only these two arrays is roughly 500 MB. If you have enough RAM + swap (1 GB) it works, if you have less (512 MB) it fails. OK, I'm slightly convinced. On the other hand: Isn't this a really strange error message from ldd