On Tue, 18 May 1999, Steve Lamb wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 May 1999 00:27:16 -0500, David Welton wrote:
Wow... Debian gets *lots* of publicity on linux.com. Very cool!
Not that it does any good. Wow, this site runs on Debian. *click*
Cool,
On Tue, 18 May 1999, David Welton wrote:
So, if this really bothers you, do something about it. Make a company
and start marketing the hell out of Debian. That's most of what
Redhat is - marketing. That's not a bad thing, necessarily -
marketing is what it takes to get your name out in the
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Brent Fulgham wrote:
RedCrap already has everyone where they want them; in their back
pocket, filling their wallet more and more everyday. Alongside VA
Research.
I find it offensive that you attack VA research,
who provides many of the resources we enjoy
as Debian
On Sun, 16 May 1999, Robert Woodcock wrote:
Michael Beattie wrote:
I have been told by an aquaintance that linux 2.1.x or greater kernels are
unlikely to boot on a Motherboard that uses a VX Chipset. I have a
VXPro...
Well at least your friends know where to get good crack.
Aye.
2.2.5
that redistribution is prohibited. So, plain and simple,
we're shit out of luck. As someone else pointed out, Kaffe is just as
good, with better response. But either way, we have to lose jdk or
convince Sun to grant us special permission to redistribute.
-Phillip R. Jaenke, Head Unix Guru, Unicent Telecom
216
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
What is wrong with distributing an installation package like is
done with netscape and realaudio?
Hrm. You know, that didn't occur to me. As long as it contains NOTHING of
JDK, that's good. :)
For the record, kaffe is *NOT* as good as
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Michael Beattie wrote:
Ahhh... The reason he said this was that OS/2 wouldnt boot... but that was
the latest version... beta even.
Uhm. FYI, Warp5 *DOES* boot on VXpro, thank you muchly. I used my screwed
up VXpro for a Warp5 machine for a few days. (Then I realized it was
On Tue, 18 May 1999, M. Robert Tomasch wrote:
I was wondering if anyone would be interested in working on a port to
some of the eprforma series because I was donated this performa 6300 and
every Mac/PPC distribution I've found has said specificly that they
don't support it. any grabs?
me,
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 03:16:38PM -0700, Craig Brozefsky wrote:
Might I suggest that someone involved with Debian PR contact
Mr. Leibovitch and attempt to open a dialog with him in order to
better educate him on why Debian has made various
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Bruce Perens wrote:
My DSL provider has gone out of business, apparently, leaving me with no
connection. Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you need to reach me.
Hrm. Wow. *shudder*
I'm very glad I opposed using LEC CoLos at work now. $100k/mo for a single
rack. Add in DSL
On Tue, 18 May 1999, tony mancill wrote:
sorry feel compelled to dive into the fray, but...
I gotta do it. If anyone's a geek in suit's clothing, I garauntee you it's
me. And I find this funny, in a sick and twisted way.
rant
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Mark Mealman wrote:
Well damn, I work
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Joseph Carter wrote:
I think prj has one such cd from Caldera and I can confirm that I've seen
one too. The person who had it wouldn't give it up unfortunately.
They're saving it for the same reasons I want it--to show people just
what kind of company Caldera really is.
*grumble*.. with kpkg
still, but I'll be sure and let everyone know when they're done. I bugged
up gcc again, so it'll be a few days probably.
-Phillip R. Jaenke, Head Unix Guru, Unicent Telecom
216-344-2603 / 9a-~5p Eastern - Pester me!
it is. and then
from there, it's generally very easy.
btw, i am working on smp support.. i have dual on f40 non-chrp, but single
on everything else still. give me a few months on that. ;)
-Phillip R. Jaenke, Head Unix Guru, Unicent Telecom
216-344-2603 / 9a-~5p Eastern - PESTER ME!
else, afterall. ;)
- -Phillip R. Jaenke ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | InterNIC: PRJ5)
Look. It works this way. Why? Because the designer said so.
Why? Because the designer is a moron. Let's fix it. --anon.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
or another. *grins, and
runs away before being pelted with tomatoes and other assorted fruits!*
- -Phillip R. Jaenke ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | InterNIC: PRJ5)
Look. It works this way. Why? Because the designer said so.
Why? Because the designer is a moron. Let's fix it. --anon.
-BEGIN PGP
procmail working, as a stopgap till I can (hopefully) find a new job, and
switch back to dedicated access. ;P
- -Phillip R. Jaenke ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | InterNIC: PRJ5)
Look. It works this way. Why? Because the designer said so.
Why? Because the designer is a moron. Let's fix it. --anon.
-BEGIN
to be done. :)
- -Phillip R. Jaenke ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | InterNIC: PRJ5)
Look. It works this way. Why? Because the designer said so.
Why? Because the designer is a moron. Let's fix it. --anon.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNrYhkztUbefKjv6dAQFKggQAkCt
to said distribution.
- -Phillip R. Jaenke ([EMAIL PROTECTED] | InterNIC: PRJ5)
Look. It works this way. Why? Because the designer said so.
Why? Because the designer is a moron. Let's fix it. --anon.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
. :) And they're definitely flexible. (I'd like to see *you*
burst out of the water, do a backflip or two midair, and make a perfect
reentry.;)
Anyways, back to getting procmail working. Just my $0.02USD. ;)
- -Phillip R. Jaenke ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
something is not right, but i don't think it's
Diamond FireGL 1000 Pro PCI Video card
512MB ECC memory
- -Phillip R. Jaenke ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
something is not right, but i don't think it's wrong. --anon.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNrS+w8ES8LwwGtVlAQECAgP/bRVHTxm6wj//OjJ3s14LPpDyUynO7Ige
-ApplePPC, and Linux-RS/6000. Two seperate
trees. Macs are very different from RS/6000's. Something that works on a
Mac, will not necessarily work on an RS/6000.
Just my $.02USD.
- -Phillip R. Jaenke ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
something is not right, but i don't think it's wrong. --anon.
-BEGIN PGP
22 matches
Mail list logo
