The only problem would be if a package like util-linux or libc6 was
auto-pulled because of this system.
Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
>
> It's freeze time, and we are all discussing the same things, we would all
> like to have a faster woody. I have a simple proposal for that:
>
> Let's keep the sy
Thanks. One more question (sorry!). Is there a way to do the equivilent
of dpkg -L on an uninstalled package?
Colin Watson wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (SCOTT FENTON) wrote:
> >Greetings all. I am in the process of engeneering a tryout of XFree 4
> >and I need to know this
,
Scott Fenton
Calm down man. The men in the white coats will be here soon.
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:47:41PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > The realplayer installer package in potato is broken and useless because
> > Real has, in their infinite wisdom, removed version 6.x of the progr
I have. In fact at one point I toyed with putting in a 2.3 kernel in.
But I'm thinking of the people who don't want to compile a new kernel
and listen to marketdroids for facts (eg. Debian is so out of date, it
still has a 2.0 kernel).
Jim Lynch wrote:
>
> If debian puts a 2.4 in, they will have
x27;t
reccomend putting it on, but please /please/ PLEASE put potato out with
a 2.4, or even pre-2.4 binary.
-scott fenton
I was wondering if we could pkg it alongside XF3.3.6 in potato (but then
again, I wondered why we couldn't do this with the 2.2 kernel in slink).
Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
>
> xfree86 4.0 released! we'll see it in woody? ciao, federico
>
> --
> Federico Di Gregorio
> MIXAD LIVE System Program
7 matches
Mail list logo
