Re: apt-findremovable v0.1 (initial release)

2006-10-03 Thread Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)
Jan Kechel: Michal Čihař wrote: Anyway if you use aptitude instead of apt-get it tracks all that automatically and you don't have to guess. Cool, didn't know that. But it doesn't work for packages that are already installed via apt-get. You can mark all packages as installed automatically

Re: Centralized darcs

2006-08-03 Thread Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)
Lars Wirzenius: to, 2006-08-03 kello 11:23 +0100, martin f krafft kirjoitti: It sure works, but you have to let mutt know about it: subscribe debian-devel@lists.debian.org That's a *good* thing. My point was that having to tell mutt manually about every mailing list is a pain, and

Re: Need for launchpad

2006-01-21 Thread Shot - Piotr Szotkowski
Kevin Mark: Also, I was checking packages.ubuntu.com - dapper - base utils-bash-view Debian changelog and it was a dead link. If you change the 'packages' in the URL to 'changelogs' it works. I mailed Frank Lichtenheld about this yesterday. -- Shot -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: [Fwd: major problem with gnome-games dependency]

2005-10-12 Thread Shot - Piotr Szotkowski
Hello. Joe Smith: In other words recommendations mean: This package does not actually NEED the listed packages, but it is unlikely you will want to install this package without the listed package. Given that auto-pulling in of recommendations is the first thing I turn off in aptitude after

Re: debian mentors ubuntu

2005-07-20 Thread Shot - Piotr Szotkowski
Hello. David Nusinow: On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:30:14AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: [The small amount of stuff that _is_ different seems to mostly be high-profile end-user GUI apps that aren't going to have much significance for a server anyway.] Then why not run Debian? My wild guess,

Re: charsets in debian/control

2004-12-11 Thread Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)
Hello. Paul Hampson: The email address isn't important, since that has to be a subset of ASCII anyway. Are the Unicode-encoded domain names supported in (modern) browsers only? I can surf to http://.pl/ (with, e.g., Firefox) - can I send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or should I always use the

Re: bad archive handling (was: Re: GNOME 2.8 on ia64 completely hosed?)

2004-12-01 Thread Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)
Hello. Sven Luther: No the real solution to this is to have the archive software accept multiple copies of a same package, and not remove the older arch:all packages when there are still arch:any package from the same source package in the archive. But the original problem (from

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

2004-12-01 Thread Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)
Hello. Ron Johnson: If Disk 1 has hot-babe on it, I couldn't give it to Dick or Jane the 13 year old neighborhood geeks. If Disk 1 has hot-babe on it, then hot-babe is one of the most popular (most wanted) packages. I'd rather have Disk 1 more usable for Debian users than more suited for