-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 05:05:38 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.18.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams <graham.willi...@togaware.com>
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 01:46:52 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams <graham.willi...@togaware.com>
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:25:38 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:12:04 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 07:17:51 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote:
]] Michael Biebl
Am 01.07.2014 19:53, schrieb Steve Langasek:
new init. But the systemd maintainers are anxious to update to a newer
version in unstable, and while there are plans in Ubuntu to make
systemd-shim support
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:05 AM, Clint Adams cl...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:08:59PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Somewhere in another universe, someone proposed moving Developer's
Reference to the wiki. One of the arguments was that it would let
you make changes _quickly_. I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 09:47:20 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Matthias Urlichs matth...@urlichs.de wrote:
Hi,
212 was released in March. Why not package that?
Not having been there, I would guess that packaging 208 had already begun
before the sprint, and thus should be completed and reasonably bug-free
before going
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org wrote:
Michael B. also updated systemd to 208 in experimental.
212 was released in March. Why not package that?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:59:53 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 19:11:33 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:23:31 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 08:21:30 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Joey Hess j...@kitenet.net wrote:
Niels Thykier wrote:
[KEY-PACKAGES]
http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
If you're curious, as I was, how this list is arrived at, here's the
source:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 00:10:06 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:35:08 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:11:46 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.7.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:03:25 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.7.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 21:04:43 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.7.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 04:31:23 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:43:15 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.6.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 22:19:10 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:05:30 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:52:52 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:07:31 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.4.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:51:44 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 22:21:45 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 16:33 +0200, Florian Reitmeir wrote:
Hi,
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Quoting Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org:
I think that it would help to understand that the package contains if the
acronyms ERP, CRM, POS were expanded (and maybe also GUI and *-RPC).
I thought
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 13:02 +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
Ok, I didn't see that this ITP already had a discussion. However there are
three minor and subjective issues that I have with this ITP:
- It's not really in the spirit of Open Source of Free Software to start a
new
project, if there
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 08:35 +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
I don't think we need another tool for this.
Maybe it's better than them in some way (not necessarily overall), which
in my books would make it good enough, meaning *we need another tool for
this*.
And I don't think such basic tools should
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 08:29 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi Neil,
On 06/04/11 19:01, Neil Williams wrote:
Testing compatibility is the larger problem. Automated tests can only
go so far. Dependencies are one thing, bugs which arise because one
setup is using a version which has already
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 18:02 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
I cannot speak for others, but I don't wait 3 years. I do
regular updates/upgrades to include the most recent security
and bug fixes. We've scheduled regular maintenance weekends
every 3 months for this. Important updates are installed
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 14:10 +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
(Provided that said action does not cause unwanted side effects, like
the documentation being out of date, because upstream forgot to
regenerate them before distribution - but that falls under the upstream
to not be a moron above ;)
I see
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 08:54 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
On 06/04/11 07:56, Paul Wise wrote:
Sounds like you are looking for backports.debian.org?
Backports for Squeeze contains just about 400 package,
AFIACS.
Would this be good enough for you if there were thousands of packages
instead?
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 16:16 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:54:00PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 14:10 +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
(Provided that said action does not cause unwanted side effects, like
the documentation being out of date
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 23:51 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Samstag, den 21.05.2011, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 00:26 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 12:26 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Benjamin
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 00:26 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 12:26 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 00:05 + schrieb Roger Leigh:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:01:12PM
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 21:51 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:39:11PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 13:00, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep...@gmail.com
wrote:
You are sharing good info, but you could have been more kind.
I guess Tshepang meant
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 11:15 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:55, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep...@gmail.com
wrote:
It was kind because the info was offered, but it was unkind because the
guy was ridiculed.
you should stop speculating what others want to say
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 08:31 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 00:10, Erik de Castro Lopo mle...@mega-nerd.com
wrote:
Is anyone looking at getting the latest version of darcs into unstable?
If not, I will have a crack at it.
Why didn't you ask its maintainers (or at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 02:30:56 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 15:16 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 06 mai 2011 à 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman a écrit :
On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote:
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for building
and
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:00 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 05/06/2011 10:49 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
What's up with the hate? It's always convenient to have a package in
Debian, instead of hunting for it upstream. If it rots in Debian, then
it can easily be removed again (or left
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote:
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : ocPortal is a Content Management System for building
and maintaining a dynamic website
How many content management systems
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:29 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, May 06, 2011 11:23:50 AM Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 09:11 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, May 06, 2011 08:56:21 AM Chris Warburton wrote:
Programming Lang: PHP
Description
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:24 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 05/06/2011 12:14 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Q: How many content management systems written in php does Debian need?
A: How about zero?
Not exactly helpful.
When developers are passionately opposed to a particular
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 20:03 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Friday 06 May 2011 19:39:26 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:24 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 05/06/2011 12:14 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Q: How many content management systems written in php does
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 13:56 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
We can stop CCing the bug# now, as this subthread is apparently no
longer about the ITP itself, but about proper conduct in discussing an
ITP.
On 05/06/2011 01:39 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Strange that you read 'support' into my
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 14:54 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 05/06/2011 02:39 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
I was responding to someone who said I 'supported' inclusion of proposed
package.
Ah, I misunderstood. My apologies.
Welcome.
Yeah, good point. So it's not enough for packager
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:13:21 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 04:05, Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org wrote:
Hi!
Since there has been a lot happening in the Debian Multimedia world
during the Squeeze release, so we figured we should give you an update
on that.
Thanks for this (excellent) update. The team has been so quite that
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep...@gmail.com
wajig (U)
Can someone help me. I don't understand what the problem here is:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/wajig.log
--
blog: http://tshepang.tumblr.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:15:59 +0200
Source: wajig
Binary: wajig
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.50.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Graham Williams graham.willi...@togaware.com
Changed-By: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:58, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:40:49 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding the
computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs. However,
the influence of
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 14:34, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:
with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding
the computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs.
Rather than RC (which is only about whether
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 15:18, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 11:17 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
spend 5 minutes to
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 13:03, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no writes:
]] Sebastian Otaegui
| * Avoid aliases forever! Lamson uses friendly regular expressions
| and FSM-based routing.
What does the flying spaghetti monster have to do
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Sami Liedes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(NOTE: Am I the only one who thinks descriptions, especially short
descriptions as in phenny, usually shouldn't tell what language was
used to implement the program? It's just not relevant to the user.)
Me agrees. Looks
Anyone out there?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On dim, 2008-03-30 at 16:25 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Things I want to see use triggers, in approximate priority order
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On dim, 2008-03-30 at 16:25 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Things I want to see use triggers, in approximate priority order:
- scrollkeeper
It will probably be deprecated soon, so I don't think it is necessary to
On 10/16/07, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today, while browsing through aptitude, I noticed that I had the
following bdb versions installed:
version: # of packages depending on it (apt-cache rdepends)
libdb4.2 40
libdb4.3 26
libdb4.4 55
libdb4.5 64
libdb4.6 40
On 4/23/07, Warren Turkal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 23 April 2007 12:58, Alan Ezust wrote:
let's say you need to build from source a program such as gimp which has
many library dependencies. You don't know what they are, and you want
debian to auto-install the -dev packages you need.
On 4/23/07, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, doubling the size of the archive is less of an issue than it
might have been in the past, since we've done the archive split, and
since ftp-master has 1.4 Terabytes of disk with half that unused, but
it is still a concern, for mirrors,
On 4/17/07, Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
then we had the result of the Debian Project Leader election. For the
second year running, I came second in a close decision[7] (boo!
*grin*), this time to Sam Hocevar instead of AJ. Congratulations to
Sam, and I wish him all the best for his
On 4/12/07, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at the submission numbers from
URL:http://popcon.debian.org/, I am happy to report that the number
of Etch installations is increasing fast. Here are the number of
submissions collected by popularity-contest, with the increment.
On 4/10/07, Jean-Christophe Dubacq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:00:08AM -0700, Sean Perry wrote:
I haven't seen much Debian in the last 6 years in the commercial
world. RH rules that roost. If people have chosen closed source, then
they likely are also paying for an
On 4/10/07, Jean-Christophe Dubacq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:40:27AM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On 4/10/07, Jean-Christophe Dubacq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I work in a science lab and can tell you that even though we do have
commercial software (Matlab
On 2/20/07, Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 09:30, Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why the gratuitous insult to Indian and Indians here? Or do
you think only one country has people who deserve pity? there are
no unfortunate people in
Hi,
It's been a while since someone mentioned removal of gst0.8 and py2.3
and wonder what's going on.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/9/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
It's been a while since someone mentioned removal of gst0.8 and py2.3
and wonder what's going on.
Concerning GStreamer 0.8, teatime, goobox and muine remain rdeps in
unstable, so GStreamer 0.8
Hi,
The useful bjorn,haxx.se/debian lists nearly 2000 packages trying to
enter Testing which keeps on growing these days due to manual hinting
of course. By I actually wonder if the release team is able to keep
up. I know there's certain kinds of packages never meant to reach
Testing, but is
On 2/9/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Pretty surprising. Was there a discussion in which this decision was
made or is this just the assumed position?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/12/threads.html#00131
I saw
On 2/5/07, Maarten Verwijs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
So as far as I'm concerned: Etch is ready to go!
Thanks for all the hard work! Debian is still the one and only
distribution for me. It Just Works. Thanks for your efforts.
Heroic distro, lovely testimony...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 1/2/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/2/07, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On 1/2/07, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not have an extra /usr/share/doc/$source-name directory
Hi,
I find it wasteful to install the same changelogs (both Debian and
upstream) in binary packages which share the same sources. Why not
have symlinks in place of these and perhaps an extra /usr/share/doc
directory named the same as the source package in case a binary
package of the same name
On 1/2/07, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:44:10PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I find it wasteful to install the same changelogs (both Debian and
upstream) in binary packages which share the same sources. Why not
have symlinks in place
On 1/2/07, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On 1/2/07, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not have an extra /usr/share/doc/$source-name directory in case a
binary package of the same name doesn't exist
Hi,
Could we have something like this after release:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Max Spevack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 16, 2006 11:39 PM
Subject: FC6 downloads and installs
To: fedora-announce-list@redhat.com
Pardon the widest possible distribution, but I hope that people
On 9/26/06, A Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi everybody
I just now notice the debate on mplayer going on;
so here are a few answers
[snip: mplayer is okay to go in]
I don't know if this is answered elswhere, but how come it is still
stuck in NEW?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On 10/19/06, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Aurelien Jarno]
I have just run lintian on all the archive (amd64) for both binaries and
sources, and the results are a bit scary. It looks like a lot of
maintainers are uploading their packages, and don't really care with the
On 10/19/06, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waw, actually, i was trying to be less aggressive...
Anyways, since I'm too pissed and since I see no reason to put myself in
that mood any further, I'm taking a few days off Debian, which means my
current work on seamonkey^Hiceape will be on
On 10/10/06, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current plan is to ship GNOME 2.14 in etch [1]. This was a hard
decision to make, but we prefer shipping a rock-solid and polished 2.14
version rather than a buggy 2.16 version with which Ubuntu is having
many issues.
[1]
On 10/8/06, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Just today mike emmel fixed the boom bug, it should technically
possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
Repeating this here for other readers: 2.10.6-2 in experimental was
uploaded today with the
On 7/15/05, Miles Bader [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I previously had xorg from Ubuntu installed, and upgrading from
that to Debian's xorg _didn't_ go smoothly: the file /etc/X11/Xsession
was created by two packages, x11-common [debian], and xorg-common
[ubuntu], and in upgrading tried to
85 matches
Mail list logo
