On Tuesday 09 November 2004 22:47, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > Debian-devel is now result number four when googling for "callwave
> > remove" (without quotes).
>
> Ah, the Duelling Banjos Effect.
>
Weird, I wouldn't jugde this people capable of using google for solving
problems their minds can't fat
On Saturday 23 October 2004 05:42, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Your ability to
> ask for features in the software programs that you use is one of the
> advantages of libre/free software.
Errm, can't you do so with any piece of software out there? The advantage of
free software is that you can do it your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 12 December 2003 01:14, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> If you're looking for an up-to-the-minute archive of Debian
> lists, check out the nntp server at gmane.org. Visit
> www.gmane.org for details.
I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) access
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 22:10, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:20:26PM +0100, Jorge Bernal (Koke) wrote:
> > The cdcat is a graphical (QT based) multiplatform (Linux/Windows)
> > catalog program which scan your directoryes/driv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 01:48, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Mike Hommey dijo [Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 12:28:44AM +0200]:
> > Maybe I'm wrong, but I think an MTA rejecting a mail because of oversized
> > body doesn't have to get the whole body before rejectin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 11:08, Tore Anderson wrote:
> > I do not intend to play BTS games here; if you change the severity back
> > to grave, or to any other RC state, I will consider it to be abuse of
> > the BTS and report your actions to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 16:06, David Smith wrote:
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
> Content-Type: text/html;
[ dsmith_sig1.GIF]
people here tend to regard stuff like your mail as spam already ...
Uli
-BEGIN PGP
On Saturday 26 July 2003 19:55, Dennis Stampfer wrote:
> I have to log out a user who is logged in via ssh. The information that
> he is not allowed to login comes from the utmp-file like the pid to
> kill.
Not sure if that helps, but 'slay' might be the proper tool for it.
Uli
On Thursday 10 July 2003 18:35, Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> * URL : http://www.some.org/
> * License : GPL2
> Description : linux audio developers configuration and connection API
>
> LADCCA is a session management system for JACK and ALSA audio
> applications on
On Sunday 22 June 2003 19:45, Isaac Jones wrote:
> There has been a lot of discussion recently on the Haskell mailing
> lists about the best ways to package Haskell libraries and tools for
> Debian. The main issues are:
>
> 1) there are a variety of "compiler" implementations, one of which is
> an
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 17:46, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Description: audio player, for geeks, by geeks.
> > Mmm, doesn't sound all that descriptive.
>
> But hardly because of the removal of the "an".
> (i.e. what business has "by geeks for geeks" rather than something
> inf
On Thursday 19 June 2003 08:30, Sven Luther wrote:
> The upstream author is not so happy about the FIFO controlled stuff,
> since it sounds as if using quark is difficult.
Right, the FIFO(implementation) is irrelevant for most users.
> I was thinking of something along the lines of :
>
> Descrip
On Monday 02 June 2003 23:31, Sean Egan wrote:
> "If the program dynamically links plug-ins, and they make function calls
> to each other and share data structures, we believe they form a single
> program, so plug-ins must be treated as extensions to the main program.
> This means they must be rele
bug).
Lastly, find out where the broken and working libdb++s come from, esp that
neither of them are out of date.
In case you couldn't find anything, sync your sources.list and 'apt-get
install --reinstall libdb3++ libdb3++-dev g++ ....'. This wont really help
finding the error though.
happy hacking
Ulrich Eckhardt
On Sunday 20 April 2003 22:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> If the upstream author is rude to me, he does not deserve any
> consideration from myself. If he chooses to alienate his clientele,
> he should expect to reap what he sowed.
Buit, this doesn't get any problems solved. Using 'an
On Thursday 10 April 2003 08:57, Marc Singer wrote:
> int func_b (void** ppv)
> {
> *ppv = (void*) 2;
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> char* test (void)
> {
> char* pa = NULL;
> func_b (&(void*)pa);
creates a pointer-to-void, copies the value of pa into it and then takes the
address of that new obje
On Thursday 10 April 2003 03:12, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I think generic 64bit libraries should put on {/lib64, /usr/lib64/,
> /usr/local/lib64, /usr/X11R6/lib64, ...}. Debian 64bit architecture
> packages should have only 64 bit libraries because it saves storage,
> and once we prepare 64bit port,
Hi Ari!
Not really relevant but www.reallyslick.com points to rss-glx.sourceforge.net
which seems to be a second independant port to X11. Also, that page even
supplies Debian-packages (though only for i386 and PPC).
Did you compare the two ports and what are their differences ?
cheers
Uli
and mail to console-data. If not, you don't have a problem. :)
regards
Ulrich Eckhardt
On Saturday 30 November 2002 16:48, Russell Coker wrote:
[snipped rant and threats]
> ... if such messages continue.
You misunderstood the way such things work, you only have to confirm once
that you intended to send a message. Of course, people should add automated
systems like the BTS to their
On Friday 16 August 2002 21:47, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How would this work? Would those using gcc-2.95 software have to set an
> > rpath or $LD_LIBRARY_PATH to take advantage of the compat libs? If so,
> > it hardly seems worth the effort; manual
1 ldso (>= 1.9.7-0)
libbz2 0 libbz2
/lib/ld-linux 2 libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
ld-linux 2 libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
libdl 2 libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4)
libpam_misc 0 libpam0g (>= 0.72-1)
libpamc 0 libpam0g (>= 0.72-1)
thanks,
Ulrich Eckhardt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 07 April 2002 22:26, King "Leo (Martin Oberzalek)" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it's not possible linking a C++ library compiled with g++-2.9x to a C++
> application compiled with g++-3.0.
>
> We all no the reasons...
>
> My question is how I should handle this, on debian distributions that
> are
eed, fellows, the hardware support-page is a bit hidden ...
> Christian Banik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ebenfalls Hamburg, also wenn Du Probleme mit der Installation hast
:-)
Ulrich Eckhardt
Hi all,
I mailed the maintainer of the above package on the eleventh of december and
haven't got a reply yet. All the bugs of the package are pretty old, a new
version of the proggy is also available upstream, current version is > a year
old.
what should I do/can be done?
Uli
On Friday 28 December 2001 07:44, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Package: foiltex
> > Description: A collection of LaTeX files for making foils.
> > A number of features are built-in including large sans serif font
While you're at it add a comma here^
> > - normal font, options for setting nor
On Monday 24 December 2001 13:32, Erik Steffl wrote:
> I am trying to make the USB work on my debian unstable system, using
> kernel 2.4.14 and it just doesn't work. the specific problem is that the
> function 'probe' (specified when registering driver) is NEVER called and
> therefore driver does
> #include
should be
#include
> #include
should be
#include
for the rest, apply either of the proposed solutions by Tellef Fog Heen.
cheers
Uli
On Friday 27 April 2001 20:49, Dale E Martin wrote:
> #include
use
#include
cheers
U
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> As Goswin mentioned earlier it's also possible to use bochs with some
> other bios
[snip]
I´m not sure if this even touches this discussion but what about using the bios
that is already present on most computers?
Wouldn´t that reduce the dependen
30 matches
Mail list logo
