On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 21:47, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
>> In a new temp directory do:
>>
>> GNUPGHOME=$(pwd) gpg-agent --daemon gpg .
>>
>> Or whatever you want to run under gpg-agent's control. This has been
>> there for ages.
>
> fwiw, this doesn't work (and actually returns an error) if
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 19:17, ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk said:
> authorisations, if the user types in a passphrase) have a lifetime
> limited by that of the gpg process which started the agent.
In a new temp directory do:
GNUPGHOME=$(pwd) gpg-agent --daemon gpg .
Or whatever you want to
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 08:24, p...@debian.org said:
> BTW, does this make parcimonie obsolete? I noticed that dirmngr
We plan to add similar fucntionality to dirmngr but that has not yet
been done and I am not sure whether we will have it for 2.2.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind
Hi,
I do not think that it is a good idea to push for 4k RSA keys! You gain
nothing from it except for slowness on small devices. Debian is used on
a lot of small devices. Further DDs are strongly represented in the WoT
and thus many keyrings will increase in size and checking all the
hash on the remote
machine is not the cleanest solution, so I have to come up with a
better way.
Werner
--
Werner Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The GnuPG Expertshttp://g10code.com
Free Software Foundation Europe
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:26:02 +0100, Matthias Urlichs said:
I'm also a bit concerned about MitM attacks; the hash-or-whatever which
Obviously you can do this only using a secure channel.
the local side is supposed to sign should probably be encrypted with the
signer's public key, otherwise I
6 matches
Mail list logo
