RE: Linux Core Consortium

2004-12-16 Thread Wichmann, Mats D
>Unfortunally, some distributions don't seem to be willing to do more >than the minimal changes to adhere to the LSB. I did some patches for >RedHat - and the bugreport is still open (I don't know whether the >patches still work). Failing some required tests seems to be quite a motivator to at

Re: Re: Linux Core Consortium

2004-12-14 Thread Wichmann, Mats D
Joey Hess wrote (on debian-devel): > My experience as a developer who's tried to write > an app to use the LSB (only the init script interface) > is that it's poorly enough specified and/or implemented > divergently within the spec to the point that I had to > test my implementation on every LSB

RE: C++ ...

2002-04-22 Thread Wichmann, Mats D
> > I want to understand why the specific said: "C++ immature" ... > > http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/gLSB/gLSB/cppmapping.html > > Would KDE be excluded based on this immaturity ? > > Thanks, > Giovanni Any C++ app is problematic today. This went somewhat off-topic, but head