-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 22:30:57 +
Source: clisp
Binary: clisp clisp-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:2.32-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 16:49:59 +
Source: aqsis
Binary: aqsis aqsis-libs-dev aqsis-libs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 01:44, Joel Baker wrote:
Appropriate? As much as any of the Valar would be; he's certainly on the
list. But since we know of at least 4 active ports, one name isn't going to
be enough...
I would hope whatever name chosen is pronounceable, spellable, reasonably
short
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 17:21, Joel Baker wrote:
Point #4: For at least the one proposed name ('Nienna'), it is, in fact,
representable (properly) in US/ASCII. Even the rest are all representable
in a clearly identifiable degenerate form (that is, no worse than many
Europeans already have to
On Monday 10 Nov 2003 19:54, Andrew Suffield wrote:
We refuse to accept it blindly because it's wrong. There have been
cases when architecture-specific optimisations have made programs run
slower (recently the instruction ordering for that via i686 chip
comes to mind); GCC gets it wrong from
On Tuesday 04 Nov 2003 05:47, Greg Stark wrote:
to list the available revisions then explicitly
apt-get install libc6:2.3.2-8
Actually this wouldn't really have helped my friend at all because he was
unlucky enough that the *first* version of libc6 from unstable that he saw
happened to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:36:58 +0100
Source: aqsis
Binary: aqsis-libs-dev aqsis aqsis-libs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 18:34:08 +0100
Source: aqsis
Binary: aqsis-libs-dev aqsis aqsis-libs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:18:26 +0100
Source: libsigsegv
Binary: libsigsegv-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:19:31 +0100
Source: clisp
Binary: clisp clisp-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:2.31-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 09:54:53 +0100
Source: clisp
Binary: clisp clisp-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:2.31-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:14:02 +0100
Source: clisp
Binary: clisp clisp-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:2.31-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:43:19 +0100
Source: aqsis
Binary: aqsis aqsis-libs-dev aqsis-libs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 08:18, Niall Young wrote:
How about a postrm::downgrade hook to reverse any changes made in the
new version's preinst::upgrade so that when the old version's
preinst::upgrade is applied you're not left with a potential mix of
configuration?
It would be cool if:
Is there any place where someone could advertise jobs that would be suitable
for Debian developers?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 19:35:16 +0100
Source: clisp
Binary: clisp clisp-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:2.30-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:52:05 +0100
Source: clisp
Binary: clisp clisp-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:2.30-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 08:34:54 +0100
Source: aqsis
Binary: aqsis aqsis-libs-dev aqsis-libs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 11:11:35 +0100
Source: aqsis
Binary: aqsis aqsis-libs-dev aqsis-libs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton
On Friday 18 April 2003 16:15, Colin Walters wrote:
Perhaps I've been overly strong with the rhetoric. Let me give two
realistic scenarios where this manage foo with debconf? fails.
Also the scenario:
3) Guy who has to install lots of boxes that aren't desktops
I have to arrange for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 10:41:43 +
Source: aqsis
Binary: aqsis aqsis-libs-dev aqsis-libs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 16:17:09 +0100
Source: libargparse
Binary: libargparse-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:01:24 +
Source: clisp
Binary: clisp clisp-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 1:2.30-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 21:12:49 +0100
Source: libsigsegv
Binary: libsigsegv-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:56:41 +0100
Source: clisp
Binary: clisp clisp-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:2.30-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 15:47:12 +0100
Source: libsigsegv
Binary: libsigsegv-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 03:56:26 +0100
Source: libsigsegv
Binary: libsigsegv-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:54:04 +0100
Source: clisp
Binary: clisp clisp-doc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:2.30-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Will Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Will Newton [EMAIL
On Tuesday 16 Apr 2002 4:04 am, Lasse Karkkainen wrote:
Well, it seems that you almost need 4.2.0 for Woody anyway, if it is
going to work with any recent hardware (unless you are aiming for
servers only). Or are you going to hack 4.2.0 display drivers into 4.1.0?
As it happens 4.2.0 seems to
On Wednesday 10 Apr 2002 3:36 pm, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
As a last resort I can NMU it, even if I'm not very in touch with the
package nor with the upstream sources.
When I prepared the NMU libxslt greater than 1.0.12 needed a newer libxml2
than was available in the archive. Now it should
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 7:35 pm, Will Newton wrote:
Quite simple fixes:
- Fixes build on hppa and quite possibly others.
- Bump version number to replace older packages correctly. (RC bug)
- Fix a minor bug in the description.
Packages and diff are here:
http://www.misconception.org.uk
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 4:16 pm, Will Newton wrote:
I have still not had any response to this. Can anyone tell me the correct
procedure for getting these bugs closed?
The changelog looks like this:
ilisp (5.11.1-7) unstable; urgency=low
* well 125744 was fixed, but I put the files
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 2:44 pm, Josip Rodin wrote:
Since you're not a maintainer, you shouldn't close them. However, you can
tag them fixed, by sending 'tag fixed' commands to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, if Craig hasn't done it by the end of today I will do that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sunday 07 Apr 2002 3:20 pm, David Starner wrote:
Why? Considering how close to the release we are, and how easy it is,
why not do it now? It certainly won't interfer with the maintainer
closing them.
OK, done. I just don't want to step on anyone's toes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 1:24 pm, Anthony Towns wrote:
velocity werken.xpathantlr
These are all pretty much bug free (antlr has a couple of wishlist bugs) but
a jikes bug is keeping them out of testing. Does anyone who knows jikes have
any idea if this can be fixed soon, or is it a
On Saturday 06 Apr 2002 3:42 pm, Will Newton wrote:
ilisp
ilisp is in fact fixed, it's just the bug has not been closed yet due to a
typo in the changelog. I'll email the maintainer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
(I have CCd to debian-devel in case you are on holiday or otherwise
indisposed to close these)
ilisp is being removed from woody because of a bug that is fixed but not
closed. According to your changelog the following bugs are fixed, but are not
closed:
125744
140049
138669
137011
98132
Quite simple fixes:
- Fixes build on hppa and quite possibly others.
- Bump version number to replace older packages correctly. (RC bug)
- Fix a minor bug in the description.
Packages and diff are here:
http://www.misconception.org.uk/will/debian/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
