Re: NFS in unstable not working, a bug?

2005-06-01 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:55:45PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I upgraded my home server machine and at the same time moved from > debian testing to unstable. Now, I've basicly got everything else > working except for nfs. With the old machine and testing distribution > everything was working

libaio dupload imminent

2005-04-22 Thread William Lee Irwin III
Following up to Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, I've put together a libaio package at http://holomorphy.com/~wli/libaio/ I figured a year or so was long enough to give people time to complain about the kernel interface vs. glibc's worker thread -based emulation library and so on, and thus far I've

Re: package rejection

2004-12-03 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004, Kevin Mark wrote: >> also, does anyone know of any other packages that never got in and the >> reasons? On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 05:04:03AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > dvdcss code, and some other MPAA bait never did, I think. Sounds like "Must not get Debian wi

Re: Anti Open Source Psyops / "Mind Tweakers"? (they'll never believe we're really aliens dept)

2003-05-31 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:23:29AM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > Think about it. You might be next! They will try to make you believe > that what is said in this message cannot be reality. You may think this > is a joke eMail, but it is not. It resembles reality in some regard -- > you must

Re: Kernel 2.5.69 problem

2003-05-15 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:08:02PM -0400, Victor Torrico wrote: > I compiled and ran the debian kernel-source-2.5.69 package. It boots OK, > however, none of he modutil functions work. I keep getting the following > error message: "QM_MODULES: Function not implemented" whenever I try things >

Re: Avifile package - help needed

2001-01-08 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:12:35PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > I went back to the archived discussion that took place in October, and > I'm surprised noone pointed this out. As far as I can tell, DivX, what > that codecs package contains, is illegal. It started off the Microsoft > DLL

Re: XFree4.0.2 / wdm interaction bug?

2001-01-07 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:02:52AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > I've experienced a bug and I'm not entirely sure what to file it against. > I'm also not sure if anyone else has ever seen this, and was hoping > someone else might try such a setup and verify the bu

XFree4.0.2 / wdm interaction bug?

2001-01-07 Thread William Lee Irwin III
I've experienced a bug and I'm not entirely sure what to file it against. I'm also not sure if anyone else has ever seen this, and was hoping someone else might try such a setup and verify the bug exists before really reporting it. I set up wdm to run X on multiple vt's thusly in /etc/X11/wdm/Xser

Re: ITP: Gwydion Dylan

2000-09-08 Thread William Lee Irwin III
At some point in the past, I wrote: >> I believe someone's already packaged Gwydion Dylan. On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:43:05PM -0700, Brent Fulgham wrote: > I believe these are old libc5 packages. The Gwydion team is > certainly not aware of any current Debian packaging activities, > certainly sin

Re: ITP: Gwydion Dylan

2000-09-08 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:05:02PM -0700, Brent Fulgham wrote: > I need to work with Gwydion Dylan, and noticed we don't currently > have a package for it. > > I vaguely remember someone talking about it long ago, but don't > remember what became of it. > > I intend to package this Dylan implemen

Re: WTF does zsh 3.1.9 does in potato-proposed-updates ?

2000-09-06 Thread William Lee Irwin III
At some point in the past, a nameless Debian user/developer posted: >> Why a new zsh was introduced in potato-proposed-updates ? It's not >> compatible with thw previous version... On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:19:42PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > What do you mean, it's not compatible? The completion

Re: RFC: moving packages to project/orphaned

2000-09-03 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:55:16PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > The follwing packages need a new maintainer: > hugs (68186), 33 days old > hugs-doc (68187), 33 days old I was under the impression that I was taking care of these two (although I haven't done much with them. Tony M