On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 03:34:32PM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
You will need xfs-xtt to view this font properly.
This is plain wrong. Since XFree86 4.0 we don't need xfs-xtt to use a
True-Type font.
Please don't put this sentence in your description.
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:16:32AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi.. out of curiosity, does anyone know what's keeping the new libusb out
of
testing? I can't find anything useful in update_excuses.html and I can't
make sense of the lines in
and to rebuild all depending
packages against this new package. If the problem is not in woody (libc
or gcc older, or ...) then we need to build all packages under woody.
Christophe
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:37:45PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:20:35PM -0400, christophe
libxml2 2.4.19-2 in unstable is broken.
All programs using this library fail with :
relocation error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: pthread_once
This could be harmless but scrollkeeper use this library and then the
upgrade of a few packages (gnome packages) fail.
Downgrading to
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:02:15AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Manoj Srivastava
| David 4) Posted the NEW public key (C5A76BF6) to the following:
| David 1) public keyservers
| David 2) debian-devel@lists.debian.org
| David 3) Main upstream
I don't understand why all theses packages are not entering woody.
As Julien explained, everything seems to be clean.
I believe we need some manual help.
Thanks,
Christophe
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 07:11:32PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Hi *,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:39:33AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:10:28PM -0700, David D. W. Downey wrote:
Not much more I can do since the old secret key and public keyrings were
lost. It's going to have to suffice as I have taken every step possible
to ensure that
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:47:33AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Have you done anything that I can't do as well right now? I
mean, I can download your old key, create a new one, and do all you
have outlined?
manoj
Because I am not yet an official dd (I am waiting for the DAM
I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
as below :
# SPAMASSASSIN
:0fw
| spamc -f
:0e
{
EXITCODE=$?
}
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Flag: YES
junk
# End of SPAMASSASSIN section
And
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:07:10PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:52:10PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procmail rule
as below :
Ok that is it.
I have increased the limit size of spamc (with -s) and the message got a
nice :
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.3 required=5.0
tests=FROM_MALFORMED,FROM_NO_USER,BADTRANS_WORM,MISSING_HEADERS version=2.11
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:40:03PM -0700, David D. W. Downey wrote:
For the purposes of consistency, I've signed the old lost key with the new
key and posted both keys to the keyservers.
...
I'm hereby using these emails, the signature on the old key as sent to
the keyservers, and the
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 07:10:28PM -0700, David D. W. Downey wrote:
Not much more I can do since the old secret key and public keyrings were
lost. It's going to have to suffice as I have taken every step possible
to ensure that the chain of events was totally and completely documented
both
happens before the updated libusb package.
The sane problem is apparently solved and gphoto2 2.0final-3 is build on
arm.
Christophe
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 02:42:59PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:56:07PM -0500, christophe barb? wrote:
I see two solutions :
. upgrade
Thank you for taking care of sane.
Christophe
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:13:18PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
christophe =?iso-8859-15?Q?barb=E9?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
The sane problem is apparently solved and gphoto2 2.0final-3 is build on
arm.
Not exactly. I uploaded
15 matches
Mail list logo
