Package: dwww
Version: 1.0-1
1) While attempting to build dwww I received the following messages:
rm -f /home/httpd-data/dwww
ln -s debian/tmp/var/lib/dwww /home/httpd-data/dwww
ln: cannot create symbolic link `/home/httpd-data/dwww' to
Package: alias
Version: 2.1-2
1) debian/rules should build package in binary-arch target rather
than binary-indep since this is a arch dependent package.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: lclint
Version: 2.1b-1
1) lclint-doc is built as architecture dependent when it's not.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mailpgp
Version: 1.0-1
1) Source doesn't extract due to an invalid .dsc file and the
.diff.gz patches reference a directory called mailpgp-1.0-1 rather
than the expected mailpgp-1.0.
2) Since the package doesn't contain any architecture dependent files,
it should be made
Package: saytime
Version: 1.0-1
1) saytime will not extract with dpkg-source due to a directory of
saytime-1.0-0 in the .orig.tar.gz archive and because the .diff.gz
attempts to patch a directory called saytime-1.0-1 when it should
saytime-1.0. Also, the .dsc file is invalid.
--
Package: io
Version: 1.12-1
1) Since the package is architecture dependent, it should be built under
the binary-arch target rathar than the binary-indep one.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mpage
Versoin: 2.4-1
1) The work being done in the binary-indep target should be moved to
the binary-arch target since the is an architecture dependent package.
(Unless, the intent was to build an mpage_2.4-1_i386.deb and an
mpage-doc_2.4-1_all.deb package?)
--
TO
tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL
Package: mhonarc
Version: 1.2.3-2
1) When extracting mhonarc, dpkg-source produced the following message:
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `/sys/downloads/mhonarc_1.2.3.orig.tar.gz'
contains object (mhonarc.orig/) not in expected directory
(mhonarc-1.2.3.orig)
--
TO
On Sat, 28 Sep 1996, llucius wrote:
Package: netcdf
Version: 2.4.3-1
1) debian/rules includes -m486 in compile options.
2) debian/rules binary-arch target should build netcdf and
netcdf-dev packages, while the binary-indep target should build the
netcdf-doc package.
3) src
Package: csh
Version: 5.26-6
1) debian/rules does not contain the binary-arch and binary-indep
targets which prevents the use of:
dpkg-buildpackage -B
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gawk
Version: 3.0.0-4
1) debian/rules clean target does not ignore errors when doing the
make distclean which causes the build to fail since there's nothing
to clean (not even a Makefile).
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL
.
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
On Sun, 22 Sep 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 1996, llucius wrote:
I'm sorry it was the -N link option that causes ae to be linked
statically. Is it really necessary to use the option?
Well, my man page says:
-N specifies readable and writable text and data
://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
than just accepting it...
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
Package: sac
Version: 1.3.1-1
1) Makefile contains architecture dependent compile option.
The following patch corrects this:
--- orig/sac-1.3.1/debian/rules Sat Sep 21 11:20:47 1996
+++ sac-1.3.1/debian/rules Sat Sep 21 16:32:55 1996
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
build:
$(checkdir)
-
Package: ae
Version: 962-9
1) debian/rules uses dpkg-shlibdeps as you normally would, but
for ae it's not necessary since ae is compiled statically.
Unfortunately, dpkg-shlibdeps does not handle this case.
The following patch corrects the problem:
diff -ruN orig/ae-962/debian/rules
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.4.0
1) dpkg-buildpackage is supposed to pass the v, m, and C flags to
dpkg-genchanges, but it doesn't.
The following patch corrects this:
--- dpkg-buildpackage~ Wed Sep 11 17:20:10 1996
+++ dpkg-buildpackage Sun Sep 22 01:38:03 1996
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
|
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
extract from the orig.tar.gz with no errors.
Thanks Heiko!
Ditto!!!
Lenad
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius
, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
Package: dhcpd
Version: 0.5.13-1
The following message was received while extracting the source:
# dpkg-source -x /sys/downloads/dhcpd_0.5.13-1.dsc
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `/sys/downloads/dhcpd_0.5.13.orig.tar.gz'
contains object (dhcpd_0.5.13.orig/) not in expected directory
On 19 Sep 1996, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
llucius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: libpng1
Version: 0.89c-1
While building on the m68k arch, I received the following from dpkg:
dpkg --build /bld/src/new/libpng-0.89c/debian/tmp ..
dpkg-deb: building package `libpng1
Package: io
Version: 1.09-1
The following message was received while extracting the source:
# dpkg-source -x /sys/downloads/io_1.09-1.dsc
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `/sys/downloads/io_1.09.orig.tar.gz' contains
object (IO-1.09.orig/) not in expected directory (io-1.09.orig)
It appears the
on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
for m68kers and was unable to
determine the cause.
Thanks,
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
be
=0555 and =0775)
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
the upload date was Aug 9th. It worked for me
anyway.
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
|
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
independent are tfm
files. Is that correct?
So, does anyone have any insight?
Thanks,
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius
...
Leland
__ Y_ a_ m_ b_ o_ | The leanest, meanest, fightinest sweet tater on Earth!
oo o oo o o |
o o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o ooo o |
-- -- -- -- -- -- | http://www.millcomm.com/~llucius (maybe one day)
33 matches
Mail list logo
