Re: Removing Packages in Slink for Debian 2.1

to the release of Debian 2.1. I have to take a look at bug #27395 because pcmcia-modules works for me. peloy.-

Re: sendmail libc6 [was: Squid2, how to handle incompatible upgrade]

the sendmail in Hamm. I did not downgraded my libc6. peloy.-

Re: Squid2, how to handle incompatible upgrade

than that, the new squid.conf was easy to set up (provided that my squid 1.2 squid.conf file was in good shape). Thanks! peloy.-

Re: More corrupted utmp/wtmp

Brandon Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm pretty sure this is the fault of xterm. After a logout, it does this. Do an ldd on ssh before rebuilding. Uhhmmm... I don't really know whose fault is this. This weekend I did a fresh install (using Enrique's 2nd 2.0.7 boot floppies pre-release)

Re: The Hamm Bugs Stamp-Out List for 1998-06-19

Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Welcome to a nem Hamm Bugs Stamp-Out List. Since Richar Braakman is currently on vacation, I will be maintaining this for the next two weeks. This is my first post, so please excuse any errors/oversights and report them to me. Wichert. Major

Re: removal of dhcp-beta?

Hi Brian, Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a bug against dhcp-client-beta that is causing it to be removed from Hamm. Should all dhcp-beta packages be removed or is omitting just this one okay? I need to know asap. Thanks. The important or critical bug report is against

Re: Need artistic type to create a Debian ad for LJ

will that happen? peloy.- -- Eloy A. Paris Information Technology Department Rockwell Automation Venezuela Telephone: +58-2-9432311 Fax: +58-2-9431645 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: /tmp/cca32686 ?

Humm... I don't see those /tmp/cca* nor anything weird in /tmp... This is a very recent Hamm. E.- Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For some reason with the newest hamm I have been getting lots of cca* files in /tmp, they are all 0 size and all created by my user. There are about

Re: RFC: monitoring maintainers' vacations

possibilities. [...] Sound like a very nice idea :-) peloy.- -- Eloy A. Paris Information Technology Department Rockwell Automation Venezuela Telephone: +58-2-9432311 Fax: +58-2-9431645 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The bug report pretty much says: xinetd: samba 1.9.18p3-1 don't work from xinetd (from inetd is ok) What I need is to know if this is a real bug or just a user configuration problem. I personally do not have/use samba, but I know of at least 2 people

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great, I didnt have time to install smaba yet, this saves me some work :) Did you try the fix posted in this list (same thread)? Do you mean adding flags = REUSE to the nmbd service in xinetd.conf? Yesterday I was trying it from home (we no luck) but I

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

, the new version is in incoming, last I checked. This is good news. However, will our Release Manager aprove the change from non-free to main? peloy.- -- Eloy A. Paris Information Technology Department Rockwell Automation Venezuela Telephone: +58-2-9432311 Fax: +58-2-9431645 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

Hi again, Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great, I didnt have time to install smaba yet, this saves me some work :) Did you try the fix posted in this list (same thread)? I got your new xinetd package from Incoming, installed it and started testing. With the fix provided in

Re: Xinetd bug #20705

Remco Blaakmeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, I did wonder why you stopped answering my messages. Sorry about that Remco, my apologies :-( I guess I got kind of busy + was afraid of dealing with xinetd, something I have never touched before :-) Today I e-mailed Jeremy Allison (from the Samba

Re: kernel 2.0.34 and hamm

Ossama Othman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A month or two? Isn't the development kernel supposed to be released as stable by then? Oh no, I don't think so. Kernel development seems to be caotic at this time. Maintainers of different parts of the kernels are complaining loudly because Linus has a

Re: Differences of Debian vs. the Other Guys

Gosh!!! This really was good Manoj. I really enjoyed reading this technical dissertation on the magic of Debian. Can't this be placed somewhere in www.debian.org? E.- Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Well, there are a number of things, but the following are important

HELP! Need dhcp-1.0.0-3!!!

Hello all, I have just installed dhcp-1.0.1-1 (replacing dhcp-1.0.0-3) and now all my clients are unable to renew their leases. I deleted the old dhcp-1.0.0-3 in my local mirror so I am unable to downgrade. Does anyone keep an old package around that can send to me or put for FTP somewhere?