> yes. It's a compatible opt-in for something that cannot be enabled for all
> binaries, instead of an opt-out. You say it's a bug, i say it's a feature.
> A really bad analogy: it's like spam, you want to opt-in not opt-out ;)
That is indeed a really bad analogy. Security shouldn't be as unwan
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:49:58PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > [...] Are you so certain that Exec-shield stops execution in shared
> > library bss/data? [...]
>
> no, it doesnt, this is the main (and pretty much only) substantial
> difference b
> Also note that I use LSM on all my kernels, so anything that conflicts with
> LSM is something that I have no ability to test and therefore no interest in
> maintaining. I'm sure I could get PaX working with LSM, but it would take
> some work. Anyway I'll look into this matter after I upload
3 matches
Mail list logo
