In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, matthew.r.pavlovich.1 wrote:
xdm-shadow is already available.
Yes, and I am using it. But the question is, does it support the pri=,
umask= and ulimit= fields in /etc/passwd? And do cron and at also
know about these fields? If
On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Herbert Xu wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, matthew.r.pavlovich.1 wrote:
xdm-shadow is already available.
Yes, and I am using it. But the question is, does it support the pri=,
umask= and ulimit= fields in /etc/passwd? And do
On Wed, 22 Apr 1998 02:41:27 +0200 Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
On 21 Apr 1998, Guy Maor wrote:
[at, cron etc and priorities]
I am not really a programer, but I wonder how hard it would be to put
support for these fields in all programs like login, xdm, cron, at and
anything I am forgetting. Could
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 03:59:18AM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 1998, Herbert Xu wrote:
BTW, about the issue of programs breaking on 50 out of the 100 different
systems they normally run on: can't this be solved by some smart #ifdef's
in the code? I'd think that if you write
On 21 Apr 1998, Guy Maor wrote:
Remco Blaakmeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If shadow-login is the only program that supports these fields, they are
useless. If a user had a value pri=5, he would only have to do something
like
echo 'command' | at now
to get 'command' executed at normal
On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, matthew.r.pavlovich.1 wrote:
xdm-shadow is already available.
Yes, and I am using it. But the question is, does it support the pri=,
umask= and ulimit= fields in /etc/passwd? And do cron and at also
know about these fields? If cron and at don't know about them and don't
Remco Blaakmeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not really a programer, but I wonder how hard it would be to put
support for these fields in all programs like login, xdm, cron, at and
anything I am forgetting. Could this be done?
The difficulty isn't so much making the change, once (though that
Remco Blaakmeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If shadow-login is the only program that supports these fields, they are
useless. If a user had a value pri=5, he would only have to do something
like
echo 'command' | at now
to get 'command' executed at normal priority.
Yes, it's not very
On Sat, 18 Apr 1998, David Frey wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 08:27:39PM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
The comment field is used by various system utilities,
such as finger(1). Three additional values may be present
in the comment field. They are
pri= - set initial value of
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 08:27:39PM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
The comment field is used by various system utilities,
such as finger(1). Three additional values may be present
in the comment field. They are
pri= - set initial value of nice
umask= - set initial value of umask
ulimit=
The comment field is used by various system utilities,
such as finger(1). Three additional values may be present
in the comment field. They are
pri= - set initial value of nice
umask= - set initial value of umask
ulimit= - set
11 matches
Mail list logo
