On Mon, Apr 09, 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
The intent is to let users disable a udev rule by removing the symlink, or
reorder a rule to a different number by renaming the symlink. Putting a rules
conffile directly in /etc/udev/rules.d/ wouldn't allow for this, and as Marco
says in #359614, this
On Apr 09, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm proposing that we change our de-facto policy for handling of files
in /etc/udev/rules.d. Currently it is this (from udev's README.Debian):
It's OK, I planned to discuss this after the release.
Experience showed that generally other packages do
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:11:57PM +0200, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
The intent is to let users disable a udev rule by removing the symlink, or
reorder a rule to a different number by renaming the symlink. Putting a
rules
I'm proposing that we change our de-facto policy for handling of files
in /etc/udev/rules.d. Currently it is this (from udev's README.Debian):
Packages should NEVER create files in /etc/udev/rules.d/, but create a
symlink the first time the package is installed (and never try again, to
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:50:58PM -0400, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm proposing that we change our de-facto policy for handling of files
in /etc/udev/rules.d. Currently it is this (from udev's README.Debian):
Packages should NEVER create files in /etc/udev/rules.d/, but create a
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:50:58PM -0400, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm proposing that we change our de-facto policy for handling of files
in /etc/udev/rules.d. Currently it is this (from udev's README.Debian):
Packages should NEVER create files in
6 matches
Mail list logo
