On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 08:58:40PM -0400, Daniel Martin wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
all the footnote says is that imake Does The Right Thing, which is why
it is exempted.
See, now I read it as imake doesn't quite do the right thing, really,
but it's imake, so
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
all the footnote says is that imake Does The Right Thing, which is why
it is exempted.
See, now I read it as imake doesn't quite do the right thing, really,
but it's imake, so we'll let it slide - fixing it everywhere is
officially deemed not
Hi!
There is a package I adopted (bugsx), which uses Imake. However the
previous maintainer didn't use upstream makefile install{,.man} targets
(which put the binary and manpage in /usr/X11R6/{man,bin}), and instead
installed them manually into /usr/{share/man,bin}.
My question is: how to
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
My question is: how to interpret policy section 12.8.7. Is to mean:
All packages using imake should puth files where imake-generated
makefile would put them, period.
or
Everything should go to /usr/{bin,share/man}, but if your package uses
imake, you're
4 matches
Mail list logo
