On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 2:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my
packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of
my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreciate it :)
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Igor Genibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 17:20]:
http://qa.debian.org/developer/
If you want to have it hosted there, you should really
a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards
for web pages (i.e. have wml
Hi!
This tool is great and very useful.
However, there is a little bug with some kind of mangling of the version
numbers:
on http://qa.debian.org/developer/index.php?package=loadwatch;,
loadwatch appears to have 2 different versions in testing and unstable
(1.0_1.1alpha1-1 and 1.0+1.1alpha1-1),
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel:
- the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...);
Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For
instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=nick
Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess:
- It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU.
I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
Packages in blue refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
Packages version in red either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU.
- On
* Igor Genibel
| I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
| following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
| Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
| packages such as:
| - the pts related page about packages
Hello,
I found another bug. In the list of available packages the source
libsigc++-1.1 is visibile/accessible but libsigc++ does not seem to exist.
Michael
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:53:11AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Igor,
Hi,
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit buttons
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:57:14AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like
'build.php?pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :)
On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the
redirect and follow the
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:25:42AM +0200, Michael Piefel écrivait:
I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
Packages in blue refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf
the Uplpoaders field in the
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
Now you, developers, can
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
Hi,
Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my
packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of
my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if
he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides
everything that you need ?
I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would work
* Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if
he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides
everything that you need ?
I'm sure some
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
Now you, developers, can track
Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf
the Uplpoaders field in the control file).
Alright, but the description uploaded by developer is a little
misleading.
I guess it detects the NMU with a regexp in the
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
Hi,
Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf
the Uplpoaders field in the control file).
Alright, but the description uploaded by developer is a
Am 28.08.02 um 16:03:28 schrieb Igor Genibel:
For instance 10a-1.1 for package kimwitu-doc. Or 3.37-3.1 for file.
I don't know why there is no Uploader field for those packages.
Because packages are not required to have an Uploaders field. I'm
afraid I don't quite understand your algorithm.
Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:17:13PM +0100, Thom May écrivait:
I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would work quite
nicely :-)
uh. E
(developer.debian.org, maybe)
The new official name is http://qa.debian.org/developer/
Cheers,
--
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:31:51PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
Because packages are not required to have an Uploaders field. I'm
afraid I don't quite understand your algorithm. For which package will
there ever be a red markup?
I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There was a
Michael Piefel wrote:
Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess:
- It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU.
I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
Packages in blue refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
Packages version in red either, even when
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:52:49AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does
Packages in blue refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many
Packages version in red either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU.
It's talking about the color of the
I see an issue with the link to bugs,non-fixed. The web page
adds the url tag raw=yes. I'm not certain of the function of that
url tag. But, with it in, the bugs page shows all of the active bugs
instead of excluding bugs that marked fixed or done.
Is this a bug in the
Am 28.08.02 um 17:20:44 schrieb Igor Genibel:
I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There was a bug,
fixed for now.
Ah, great! I really don't have anything to complain about now.[1]
Bye,
Mike
[1] Where I come from, I can't complain is equivalent to
I think it's
* Igor Genibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 17:20]:
http://qa.debian.org/developer/
If you want to have it hosted there, you should really
a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards
for web pages (i.e. have wml files in qa/wml which are build
and then copied to
Hi all,
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
packages such as:
- the pts related page about packages (Thanks a lot to
Hi Igor,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
I waiting for you comments, advices, insults or other things.
Many thanks for your
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:24:57 +0200
Igor Genibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...);
- the broken dependencies for each branch (stable, testing, unstable).
This is simply, great. Good work!
It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any logs
Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this?
bWarning/b: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9
in b/home/igenibel/public_html/html.php/b on line b349/bbr /
br /
bWarning/b: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9
in b/home/igenibel/public_html/html.php/b
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I
wasn't watching. Thanks!
I
Igor Genibel writes:
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package.
According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
Igor Genibel writes:
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
Igor Genibel writes:
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version
Hi Igor,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit buttons
for each of
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:11:40PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I
wasn't watching. Thanks!
Thanks a lot to.
I notice one slight glitch; following a PTS link to a lib* package takes
you to e.g.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
Igor Genibel writes:
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
stable and testing, but there is no such version of that
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:08:44AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this?
Surely not ! ;)
bWarning/b: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9
in b/home/igenibel/public_html/html.php/b on line b349/bbr /
br /
bWarning/b:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Igor Genibel wrote:
Hi all,
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
packages such as:
- the
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:10:26PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any logs with
build failure in the buildd link,
but it probably needs more work on the buildd page side?
Last year (!) I write a patch for the buildd log page and
Am 27.08.02 um 15:03:31 schrieb Colin Watson:
I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package.
According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists.
Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
Hi,
I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in
stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package.
According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists.
It is now fixed. As Colin
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:18:58PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn seems to provoke the bug
Daniel Burrows mentioned, so there's probably some additional regexp
metacharacter escaping needed somewhere.
Yes, very similar problem for kimwitu and
Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel:
- the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...);
Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For
instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=nick you
can see there is 1 bug for the file package. But in fact there's
Igor Genibel wrote:
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
This is very nice. A few comments:
- It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU.
- On a 1280 pixel wide display, I can only
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote:
I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php)
following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson).
Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your
packages such as:
-
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like
'build.php?pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :)
On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the
redirect and follow the spec,
46 matches
Mail list logo
