Em Dom, 2006-04-23 às 01:37 +0200, Kurt Roeckx escreveu:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:10:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
The currently library seems to be libgtkdatabox-0.2.4.so.7.0.0
and has an soname of libgtkdatabox-0.2.4.so.7. I guess the the
new one will have something like
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there
was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had
personal reasons to stay with an outdated version. Now I was
asked to package the latest version and the library is probably
not important enough to keep different
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there
was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had
personal reasons to stay with an outdated version. Now I was
asked to package the latest
Joe Smith wrote:
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there
was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had
personal reasons to stay with an outdated version. Now I was
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 11:10:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there
was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had
personal reasons to stay with an outdated version. Now I was
asked to package the latest version
Scripsit Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0.
[...]
My guess is that there is an ABI change involved and thus I have to
rename the package to libgtkdatabox-0.5.2.0-X . My question is:
What is the right choice for 'X' if I skipped several upstream
6 matches
Mail list logo
