Sven Joachim:
> On 2016-07-06 02:51 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> This has happened now with the upload of dpkg 1.18.8.
>
> Anyone volunteering to upgrade the severity of those 82 bugs to serious?
>
> Cheers,
>Sven
>
>
> 1.
>
On 2016-07-06 02:51 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-04-03 at 17:29:32 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> The targets are "officially" mandatory and have been since 3.9.4
>> (released in September 2012). Currently lintian and dpkg still forgive
>> their absence to avoid auto-rejects and
Hi!
On Sun, 2016-04-03 at 17:29:32 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> The targets are "officially" mandatory and have been since 3.9.4
> (released in September 2012). Currently lintian and dpkg still forgive
> their absence to avoid auto-rejects and FTBFS bugs.
> However, Guillem and I would like
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 05:29:32PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The package #PACKAGE# builds an architecture independent *and* an
> architecture dependent package, but does not have the (now mandatory)
> "build-arch" and "build-indep" targets in debian/rules.
>
> We would like to phase
Hi,
The targets are "officially" mandatory and have been since 3.9.4
(released in September 2012). Currently lintian and dpkg still forgive
their absence to avoid auto-rejects and FTBFS bugs.
However, Guillem and I would like to get the remaining packages
updated sooner rather than later
5 matches
Mail list logo