Aurélien GÉRÔME writes:
Hi Ludovic,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:56:06PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
So, my idea of a buildd pseudo-package in the BTS was a god one after
all. Or, is the 'dak' package an appropriate place for such requests?
An excellent one, indeed!
OK, filed #379451
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
It has been a week since I sent the request below, and I received no
answer. I am resending to the three maintainers of
Packages-arch-specific, and CCing debian-devel.
Been out for a bit - updated.
lamont
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 01:56:09PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
Been out for a bit - updated.
You did not do mine. Pretty please, I am begging for it. Please remove
the line concerning iroffer.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'` Free Software Developer
`- Unix Sys Net
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 07:47:16PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
OK, filed #379451 (serious, because it blocks the Ada transition). I
note however that dak has 58 outstanding bugs, the newest of which is
63 days old and the oldest is 4 years and 106 days old today.
Your bug has already been
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
It has been a week since I sent the request below, and I received no
answer. I am resending to the three maintainers of
Packages-arch-specific, and CCing debian-devel.
I've restricted the list of supported architectures to
Kurt Roeckx writes:
I've actually requested the same changes for ada.
I've always been annoyed by the lack of response we get when
sending updates for it. There are other changes I'm waiting for.
So, my idea of a buildd pseudo-package in the BTS was a god one after
all. Or, is the 'dak'
Hi Ludovic,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:56:06PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
So, my idea of a buildd pseudo-package in the BTS was a god one after
all. Or, is the 'dak' package an appropriate place for such requests?
An excellent one, indeed!
Does anyone on this list feel like joining the
It has been a week since I sent the request below, and I received no
answer. I am resending to the three maintainers of
Packages-arch-specific, and CCing debian-devel.
I've restricted the list of supported architectures to those where
gnat-4.1 not only exists but also builds its shared
8 matches
Mail list logo
