On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 06:10:05AM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Thus on amd64 digikam depends on libkexiv2-1 and conflicts with
> > > libexiv2-0.12, but libkexiv2-1 depends on libexiv2-0.12.
> > Why does it need to conflict?
> The conflict was done
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Thus on amd64 digikam depends on libkexiv2-1 and conflicts with
> > libexiv2-0.12, but libkexiv2-1 depends on libexiv2-0.12.
>
> Why does it need to conflict?
Thanks Steve,
The conflict was done to prevent the situation where:
digikam was linked aga
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 09:10:46PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> You are correct, sorry for closing out your bug so quickly..
> Question for debian-devel. I'm aware of the Debian Library Packaging guide,
> but
> not quite sure how we should of handled this library transition, short of
> waiting
reopen 425381
thanks
Thanks Andrew,
You are correct, sorry for closing out your bug so quickly..
Question for debian-devel. I'm aware of the Debian Library Packaging guide, but
not quite sure how we should of handled this library transition, short of
waiting
for each library to be built by the
4 matches
Mail list logo
