Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages - without objection versus requiring ACKs

2012-10-26 Thread Bart Martens
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:06:34AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: Why not start with a without objection standard and see how it works? The without objection approach would require a reasonable delay for people to raise objections (some say two months). The ACK/NACK approach allows to reach a

Re: [SUMMARY/PROPOSAL] Orphaning another maintainer's packages - without objection versus requiring ACKs

2012-10-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:06:34AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: Why not start with a without objection standard and see how it works? The without objection approach would require a reasonable delay for people to raise objections (some say two months).