On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:48:09AM +, Magos?nyi ?rp?d wrote:
> I guess having kernel-image-vanilla and/or
> kernel-image-onlybugfix in debian would not hurt.
Or kernel-image-hx ... what caught me out was believing
kernel-image-2.4.xx or whatever was relatively pristine. However naive
that make
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy [EMAIL PROTECTED] a következőeket írta:
> > > but I wouldn't touch Herbert's kernels with a ten-feet pole.
[]
> a) I can do better
Please do then.
I guess having kernel-image-vanilla and/or
kernel-image-onlybugfix in debian would not hurt.
> b) I don't do
A levelezőm azt hiszi, hogy Daniel Jacobowitz a következőeket írta:
>
> what they get>
>
> No, really. This is what stable and testing releases are for.
I fully agree. But...
When I tell it to my friends, some say that stable is way too
old for them. In these cases I used to think about how t
3 matches
Mail list logo