* Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030417 03:30]:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 05:10:58PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>
> > > We have at least three parallel menu systems around: the Debian Menu,
> > > the Gnome Foot Menu and the KDE menu.
> > We have one menu system: the Debian menu.
> > And we h
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 05:10:58PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > We have at least three parallel menu systems around: the Debian Menu,
> > the Gnome Foot Menu and the KDE menu.
> We have one menu system: the Debian menu.
> And we have several programs with menus, like Gnome, KDE, fvwm, icewm,
On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 11:10, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> So instead of using a system that works and can do what we need
> (with the exception of generating KDE-menus, though I do not see
> the fault in our system here),
The current menu system doesn't support i18n for one thing.
Anyways, there
* Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030416 15:38]:
> > > With all the new anvances in Linux Desktop tecnologies, it seems like
> > > the current menu system needs some redesign to keep up and integrate
> > > with the other existing systems.
> > Please explain this phrase. Ecspecially the "other exis
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 10:38:57PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > I would like to propose that we switch to the freedesktop.org .menu
> > > format for desktop entries, and we keep providing menu informations for
> > > applications that do not provide one on their own.
> > Wasn't Chris Lawrence
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 08:21:03PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > With all the new anvances in Linux Desktop tecnologies, it seems like
> > the current menu system needs some redesign to keep up and integrate
> > with the other existing systems.
> Please explain this phrase. Ecspecially the "o
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:58:12PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 12:16, Enrico Zini wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose that we switch to the freedesktop.org .menu
> > format for desktop entries, and we keep providing menu informations for
> > applications that do not provid
* Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030410 18:51]:
> With all the new anvances in Linux Desktop tecnologies, it seems like
> the current menu system needs some redesign to keep up and integrate
> with the other existing systems.
Please explain this phrase. Ecspecially the "other existing systems".
On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 12:16, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I would like to propose that we switch to the freedesktop.org .menu
> format for desktop entries, and we keep providing menu informations for
> applications that do not provide one on their own.
Wasn't Chris Lawrence working on this? Or maybe he
One minor point:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:16:25 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
[...]
> The former seems to be one the way to to overcome the limitations of the
> existing systems, where Mozilla is a web browser, an HTML editor and a
> mail reader, but can only be found under one arbitrary entry of those
Ciao Enrico,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Enrico Zini wrote:
> The advantages would be to adhere to an existing, open standard (and
> push it), to provide a better system (with multiple cathegories and menu
> translations) and to better integrate with the desktop environments we
> package. The latter i
Hello.
With all the new anvances in Linux Desktop tecnologies, it seems like
the current menu system needs some redesign to keep up and integrate
with the other existing systems.
Since the desktop menu problem is shared with at least the Gnome and KDE
people, I've asked in the gnome-usability lis
12 matches
Mail list logo
