On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 11:58:16AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
How about this one?
I told him I would remove the first sentence but other than that it looks
okay to me.
Michael
- Forwarded message from Matthias Ettrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
If we do something like this, I'd
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 01:44:18PM -0300, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
people to distribute LyX in both source and binary forms. This permission
certainly includes linking against GUI toolkits like XForms, Motif, GTK,
Qt
or Win32.
`... and distributing the resulting binary.' should
How about this one?
I told him I would remove the first sentence but other than that it looks
okay to me.
Michael
- Forwarded message from Matthias Ettrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
If we do something like this, I'd rather suggest a text like:
The GPL is often a source of missunderstanding
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Michael Meskes wrote:
How about this one?
I told him I would remove the first sentence but other than that it looks
okay to me.
looks good to me, with or without the first sentence.
it's true, anyway. the GPL is often a source of misunderstanding and
confusion.
looks good to me, with or without the first sentence.
For me too.
it's true, anyway. the GPL is often a source of misunderstanding and
confusion. witness KDE, for example.
Yes, your right. But I think this sentence doens´t fit well into a license
file.
if ettrich is willing to write
people to distribute LyX in both source and binary forms. This permission
certainly includes linking against GUI toolkits like XForms, Motif, GTK, Qt
or Win32.
`... and distributing the resulting binary.' should be added.
You can always link in the privacy of your home. What GPL
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I told him I would remove the first sentence but other than that it looks
okay to me.
Yeah.
With that first sentence in, I think he'd argue that he doesn't need
anyone's permission to apply it to third-party GPLed software: he's
declaring what the GPL
7 matches
Mail list logo
