Subject: missing information in manpage
Package: mkisofs
Version: 1.05-1
The manpage issues the possibility to set a volume-id with
-V volid but forgets to mention which size it may be, other
sizes are mentioned: preparer_id, publisher_id
Regards,
Martin
Subject: jkj
Package: gcc
Version: 2.7.2-5
Package: gcc
Version: 2.7.2-5
Unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to the Ftape-HOWTO, Travan drives are supported.
Hope this helps.
Susan Kleinmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: latex,xdvik
Version: 2e-4, 18f-4
LaTeX + Xdvi + dvips cannot do a umlauts.
A simple latex file was made with some \a s in it and
they did not show up on xdvi as a umlauts, they were missing
altogether.
Using debian 0.93R6, kernel 1.2.13, libc4.6.27
Tuomas
Package: mailx
Version: 8.1-5
-chiark:~/mail mailx spong
Subject:
^C
^C
^Z
[1]+ Stopped mailx spong
-chiark:~/mail kill %1
[1]+ Stopped mailx spong
-chiark:~/mail
[1]+ Terminated mailx spong
-chiark:~/mail
On Thu, 7 Dec 1995, David Engel wrote:
So far I have been unable to find a copy of the patch that lets you fall
back to another directory. However, support is already in there to allow
I don't know that the patch even exists anymore. However, a quick and
dirty hack is only a two line
Bill Mitchell writes (Re: Unidentified subject!):
Matthew Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't know if this is a good news or bad news.
but I think there is a big misunderstanding about debian-0.93 and debian-1.0
I really forsee the need to do this
debian-0.93
release - debian-0.93
I wrote:
I've added/edited various README's and .message files. Take a look at
what you see now; I think it's pretty hard to miss ...
I forgot to say that I *didn't* edit README.DEBIAN.
Ian M., can you do that ?
Ian.
I don't know if this is a good news or bad news.
but I think there is a big misunderstanding about debian-0.93 and debian-1.0
I really forsee the need to do this
debian-0.93
release - debian-0.93
development/debian-1.0
NOTICE: NO LINK
development/trial-packages (or some such instead of inside
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:17:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Matthew Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am getting 10 - 15 complaints a day about this debian-1.0 and how
it won't install all the way or that it isn't all ELF as advertised
previously. Well I know I bite my teeth and press delete on all
Matthew Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't know if this is a good news or bad news.
but I think there is a big misunderstanding about debian-0.93 and debian-1.0
I really forsee the need to do this
debian-0.93
release - debian-0.93
development/debian-1.0
NOTICE: NO LINK
On Fri, 17 Nov 1995, Ian Murdock wrote:
Why would the mirror program be removing debian-0.93?
No, They have told mirror to exclude it due to space restrictions
I have been telling them NOT to mirror 1.0 if they are under a space crunch.
But rather just get debian-0.93 instead..
--
Andrew D. Fernandes wrote:
Date: Sun Oct 15 20:39:21 EDT 1995
Package: nls
Version: 1.0-1
Description: The XFree86 Motif-1.2 resource defaults.
Priority: Low
# File: name size md5sum destination
File: nls-1.0-1.deb 10086 97a80aaba566821cf61aa92c06421e74 binary/x11
File:
401 - 414 of 414 matches
Mail list logo