On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Hey folks, I'm looking for Frans Pop , I think he
> also used f...@debian.org but both e-mail addresses are bouncing...
> Anyone know his new e-mail address
Thanks for the hint, unfortunately I was informed Frans Pop pass
Hey folks, I'm looking for Frans Pop , I think he
also used f...@debian.org but both e-mail addresses are bouncing...
Anyone know his new e-mail address?
Luis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Dear User,
This e-mail address is no longer in use.
Please contact our Support Team by using the links on the site where you
purchased your music.
If you are unable to access the site, or have forgotten where you purchased
your music, you can e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EM
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:45:17PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Does anyone know the contact e-mail address for the RC bugs web page
> (http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/)? The address [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> listed in that page, does not work. I get:
Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
Does anyone know the contact e-mail address for the RC bugs web page
(http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/)? The address [EMAIL PROTECTED],
listed in that page, does not work. I get:
===
This message was created
Thanks for your comments.
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > > I remail my email from debian.org machines, I do not forward it. So, I
> > > do not have the problem (I have others, but it is a different story).
> > >
> > > master:~ % cat .procmailrc
> > >
> > > :0
> > > ! [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 06:31:05PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:22:30PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:15:19AM +0100,
> > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > a message of 47 lines which said:
> >
> > > If you know easy way
On Thu, 04.11.2004 at 00:15:19 +0100, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand my ISP's rationale which is to reduce virus mails hitting
> ISP's mail server. I also understand that SPF will not be a bullet
> proof against mail forgery.
Please point your ISP to this interview (esp. pag
Hi, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Uhm, having just read through the supplied URL, I can't agree with the
> sanity of the proposal. It appears to require that headers not be modified
> at all in transit
You can tell it which headers to protect, so that's not a problem.
In theory. Mailing lists do have
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 11:48:29AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:38:20 +1100, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's a question you'll have to ask of Yahoo and the SPF people. My guess
> > is that the pushers of these schemes want their thing adopted for whate
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:22:30PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:15:19AM +0100,
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 47 lines which said:
>
> > If you know easy way to avoid this problem exists, please let me
> > know.
>
> I remail my emai
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:38:20 +1100, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a question you'll have to ask of Yahoo and the SPF people. My guess
> is that the pushers of these schemes want their thing adopted for whatever
> reason (corporate greed, personal gratification, whatever), but
* Matthew Palmer
| See, that's the thing that the FAQ was unclear on. If you don't have to
| sign all headers, then you're OK. I was thinking the attachment of
| Received: headers as being particularly problematic. To quote the FAQ:
|
| "Mailing lists that do not change the content or re-arra
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 03:15:09PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 10:37:08PM +1100, Matthew Palmer said
> > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > It gives you traceability and it can be used to prevent joe-jobs.
> > > It's not a silver bullet solut
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 10:37:08PM +1100, Matthew Palmer said
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > It gives you traceability and it can be used to prevent joe-jobs.
> > It's not a silver bullet solution against spam.
>
> And yet it's being touted as one. I predic
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 10:37:08PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Matthew Palmer
> > | Uhm, having just read through the supplied URL, I can't agree with the
> > | sanity of the proposal.
> > | It appears to require that heade
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Matthew Palmer
> | Uhm, having just read through the supplied URL, I can't agree with the
> | sanity of the proposal.
>
> | It appears to require that headers not be modified at all in transit
> | (which means that forwarding be
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:15:19AM +0100,
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 47 lines which said:
> If you know easy way to avoid this problem exists, please let me
> know.
I remail my email from debian.org machines, I do not forward it. So, I
do not have the problem (I have oth
* Matthew Palmer
| Uhm, having just read through the supplied URL, I can't agree with the
| sanity of the proposal.
| It appears to require that headers not be modified at all in transit
| (which means that forwarding becomes impossible),
Uhm, which headers are modified by a forwarding agent?
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 09:59:44AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Osamu Aoki
>
> | If you know easy way to avoid this problem exists, please let me know.
> | (Changing ISP is certainly an option.)
>
> Use BSTMP to gluck.
>
> (If your ISP can't be whacked into turning it off/Implementing yaho
* Osamu Aoki
| If you know easy way to avoid this problem exists, please let me know.
| (Changing ISP is certainly an option.)
Use BSTMP to gluck.
(If your ISP can't be whacked into turning it off/Implementing yahoo's
DomainKeys proposal, which looks fairly sane to me;
http://antispam.yahoo.com
I think
> debian.org mail address is no exception. This is expected behavior.
>
> Since debian.org address is used frequently used to receive debian bug
> report, this is not a desirable situation. Unless some serious concern
> was raised here, I think implementing SRS[3] type infra
ome people who implemented
proper SPF policy with "-all" and tried to send me an e-mail through my
DD account. The forwarded mail from Debian is REJECTED due to SPF
policy on my ISP side.[2]
SPF has known issue with e-mail forwarder such as pobox.com. I think
debian.org mail address is no
Speaking of new-maintainer re-opening soon... What about those that
had submit'd applications back in 1999 (I believe I sent mine in nearly
8 months ago), does anyone know if they need to be re-submit'd or will they
be picking up where they stop'd processing?
Respectfully,
> I am interested in becoming a Debian developer. The information in
> Debian Developer's Reference section 2.2 mentions that I can send in a
> copy of my ID to certify my identity, but it does not specify an
> address to send this to.
You would send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], along with the rest
I am interested in becoming a Debian developer. The information in Debian
Developer's Reference section 2.2 mentions that I can send in a copy of my ID to
certify my identity, but it does not specify an address to send this to.
Can you please give me this address?
Norman Cabrera (Norm Camero is
27 matches
Mail list logo
