Re: 2.0.34 and x-bit on libraries

1998-06-25 Thread Joel Klecker
At 13:22 -0700 1998-06-24, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: . 2.0.34 needs the x-bit on shared libraries! Actually, no, it's just the dynamic linker that needs to be executable. This is apparently a security feature, 2.1 kernels also require an executable dynamic linker, and thus 2.2 will as well.

Re: 2.0.34 and x-bit on libraries

1998-06-25 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
On Wed, Jun 24, 1998 at 05:50:08PM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote: : At 13:22 -0700 1998-06-24, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: : . 2.0.34 needs the x-bit on shared libraries! : : Actually, no, it's just the dynamic linker that needs to be executable. : : This is apparently a security feature, 2.1

2.0.34 and x-bit on libraries

1998-06-24 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
Hello, as somebody (Harald Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] pointed out and as we (Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] and me) could reproduce after some grief about a non-functional ftp server (using wu-ftpd-academ) we got the impression, that . 2.0.34 needs the x-bit on shared libraries! This is

Re: 2.0.34 and x-bit on libraries

1998-06-24 Thread Gregory S. Stark
Heiko Schlittermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, as somebody (Harald Schueler [EMAIL PROTECTED] pointed out and as we (Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] and me) could reproduce after some grief about a non-functional ftp server (using wu-ftpd-academ) we got the impression, that .