Hi,
I've blogged about it, but I'll re-post to the list for easier commenting.
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/diary/daily/2006-Mar-4.html.en#2006-Mar-4-23:12:11
While I was reviewing Debian Weekly News translations, I noticed there
was autopkgtest. Nice to see something that emerging to be
ava
Hi,
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I've checked out xnee, I've noticed that the info documentation was
> > not properly installed, and provided a patch. Looked over the BTS,
> > tried running, found the same error as bug 315736.
>
> Curious of xnee, I installed it to try out t
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I've checked out xnee, I've noticed that the info documentation was
> not properly installed, and provided a patch. Looked over the BTS,
> tried running, found the same error as bug 315736.
Curious of xnee, I installed it to try out too,
Hi,
> > [Junichi Uekawa]
> > > 3. support for X. Some of my packages are command-line console tools,
> > >but many are actually graphical apps. It would be a plus to have
> > >some kind of interactive/noninteractive X-based testing.
> >
> > Would xnee do the trick?
>
> Actually, I wasn't
Hi,
> [Junichi Uekawa]
> > 3. support for X. Some of my packages are command-line console tools,
> >but many are actually graphical apps. It would be a plus to have
> >some kind of interactive/noninteractive X-based testing.
>
> Would xnee do the trick?
Actually, I wasn't aware of xnee.
[Junichi Uekawa]
> 3. support for X. Some of my packages are command-line console tools,
>but many are actually graphical apps. It would be a plus to have
>some kind of interactive/noninteractive X-based testing.
Would xnee do the trick?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Hi,
> >
> > * Let's modify pbuilder to run test-build tests and (if
> > possible) also the generic tool and test-install tests.
> > These belong, I think, better into pbuilder then piuparts,
> > but it might be that piuparts should run them also.
>
> pbuilder hook is ava
7 matches
Mail list logo
