Re: A new debhelper program required?

2006-08-06 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Hendrik Sattler wrote: > How about patching thunderbird to look at both directories? > > HS > I can, somehow, grok maintaining a thunderbird extension, but delving into the actual thunderbird code is way over my available time at the moment. :-( Yes, I know, I can open a bug and dump this on t

Re: A new debhelper program required?

2006-08-05 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Hi, Am Samstag 05 August 2006 22:36 schrieb Shachar Shemesh: [...] > and I ended up manually creating the symbolic link from > /usr/lib/thunderbird/extensions/{guid} to > /usr/share/lib/thunderbird/extensions/{guid}. [...] > 1. Should I have solved the problem differently? Perhaps creating a dual

A new debhelper program required?

2006-08-05 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Hi all, I came across the following need, and was wondering what the best way to solve it would be. I'm packaging a Thunderbird extension that is 100% javascript. I.e. - it's an "Architecture: All" package. Thunderbird expects that all files from such a package that would normally go into /usr/li