Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> writes: > ... now it is only the two of us which needs to stop talking and start > proposing patches as needed :-)
ok. Here's the plan: - Identify a "candidate" package to add (as a patch) an upgrade feature based on Config::Model. - Then, I'll patch this source package to use Config::Model during upgrade and test it at home - Then, I'll send the patch for review and comments Now, I need some help to identify the package I'll will work on. This package should have a configuration not too complex and its configuration definition should not move too fast. So this excludes exim, sendmail and xorg. So, do you have a configuration peeve package that fit the criteria above and bothered you during upgrades ? Does anyone want to participate actively to improve upgrade with Config::Model ? (yes, this is a call for help :-) ) All the best -- Dominique Dumont "Delivering successful solutions requires giving people what they need, not what they want." Kurt Bittner irc: domidumont at irc.freenode.net ddumont at irc.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
