On Saturday 29 August 2009, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> > Would the following also work to use an *un*compressed packages file:
> > Acquire::CompressionTypes::"" "";
>
> A quick test suggest that this would work as a hack, but apt doesn't
> like uncompressed files and will print many false-negative
> I looked in /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz first, but I
> could not find it there. Should it be added?
Yes, it should be. A few others seems to be missing also...
Will be added in the next upload round.
>> The description is far from being perfect and a few things are missing
>>
On Saturday 29 August 2009, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 18:34, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Michael Vogt wrote:
> >> It looks like this is releated to the new code that adds lzma
> >> support for Package file downloads and the option to configure in
> >> what order the compression t
Hi Frans Pop & debian-devel,
> Thanks! David Kalnischkies and I were able to reproduce a crash for
> sources that had no Packages file. This is fixed with the 0.7.23.1
For anybody further interested in the bug:
Something like a index-out-of-bounce, but libapt didn't access the end
(this was checke
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:41:23PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Fr, 28 Aug 2009, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > the compression types should be used. I can not reproduce this
> > failure, Could you please send me your sources.list and the
> > architecture you are using?
>
> amd64, sources.list att
Michael Vogt wrote:
> It looks like this is releated to the new code that adds lzma support
> for Package file downloads and the option to configure in what order
> the compression types should be used.
That last is really excellent news! I have some slow systems where using
gzip will be *much* f
On Fr, 28 Aug 2009, Michael Vogt wrote:
> the compression types should be used. I can not reproduce this
> failure, Could you please send me your sources.list and the
> architecture you are using?
amd64, sources.list attached, but some of the repositories are local
on my disc.
I checked that down
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 03:55:26PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Today: apt0.7.23 and bang:
> $ apt-get update
> ..
> 99% [11 Packages rred 2154496] [Waiting for headers] [Waiting for
> headers]Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
>
> WARNING to everyone.
Thanks for your warning.
> Program
Today: apt0.7.23 and bang:
$ apt-get update
...
99% [11 Packages rred 2154496] [Waiting for headers] [Waiting for
headers]Segmentation fault (core dumped)
WARNING to everyone.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x7fdea4ad8d6d in pkgAcqIndex::Failed(std::string,
pkg
9 matches
Mail list logo
