Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've never had the kernel glitch on any of these (thankfully!) Sounds like
> there may be some obscure problems - I know the pre-patches did not work
> well on master. Perhaps we should chuck .34 on murphy and master and see
> how it handles there? - Le
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "There's always one more bug"
> I got it. At least, I got one...
>
> Adam P. Harris writes:
> > I know there were a few cyrix-specific fixes introduced in 2.0.34.
> > Maybe some of the people experiencing this problem might test it out
> > with that ke
On 13 Jun 1998, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> >Sounds like it should go in extra, for now.
>
> OTOH our news server didn't survive longer then a day with 2.0.[0-3] and
> runs rockstable with 2.0.34 ...
My machine has been running .34 for two days now, I have a proxy server at
work that has be
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hm, be careful with 2.0.34...
>
>Sounds like it should go in extra, for now.
OTOH our news server didn't survive longer then a day with 2.0.[0-3] and
runs rockstable with 2.0.34 ...
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, be careful with 2.0.34...
Sounds like it should go in extra, for now.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"There's always one more bug"
I got it. At least, I got one...
Adam P. Harris writes:
> I know there were a few cyrix-specific fixes introduced in 2.0.34.
> Maybe some of the people experiencing this problem might test it out
> with that kernel? That might push out to definately try to get 2.
6 matches
Mail list logo