Re: About 2.0.34 not being perfect

1998-06-14 Thread Adam P. Harris
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've never had the kernel glitch on any of these (thankfully!) Sounds like > there may be some obscure problems - I know the pre-patches did not work > well on master. Perhaps we should chuck .34 on murphy and master and see > how it handles there? - Le

Re: About 2.0.34 not being perfect

1998-06-13 Thread Adam P. Harris
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "There's always one more bug" > I got it. At least, I got one... > > Adam P. Harris writes: > > I know there were a few cyrix-specific fixes introduced in 2.0.34. > > Maybe some of the people experiencing this problem might test it out > > with that ke

Re: About 2.0.34 not being perfect

1998-06-13 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On 13 Jun 1998, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > >Sounds like it should go in extra, for now. > > OTOH our news server didn't survive longer then a day with 2.0.[0-3] and > runs rockstable with 2.0.34 ... My machine has been running .34 for two days now, I have a proxy server at work that has be

Re: About 2.0.34 not being perfect

1998-06-12 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hm, be careful with 2.0.34... > >Sounds like it should go in extra, for now. OTOH our news server didn't survive longer then a day with 2.0.[0-3] and runs rockstable with 2.0.34 ...

Re: About 2.0.34 not being perfect

1998-06-12 Thread Raul Miller
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hm, be careful with 2.0.34... Sounds like it should go in extra, for now. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

About 2.0.34 not being perfect

1998-06-12 Thread Yann Dirson
"There's always one more bug" I got it. At least, I got one... Adam P. Harris writes: > I know there were a few cyrix-specific fixes introduced in 2.0.34. > Maybe some of the people experiencing this problem might test it out > with that kernel? That might push out to definately try to get 2.