On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
non-free package are showing that they do not understand
our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:06:50AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
non-free package are showing that they do
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of my initial packages was non-free (still is, although I hold out
hope for a licence change at some point). I suggest that a better policy
is closer to this:
New maintainers applying as packagers should contribute something to
main as part of
Hi,
I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
non-free package are showing that they do not understand
our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
--
Jérôme Marant
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Hi,
I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
non-free package are showing that they do not understand
our philosophy and dedication to Free
On 14 Jan 2002, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Hi,
Hi Jérôme,
I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
non-free package are showing that they do not understand
our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
do
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
non-free package are showing that they do not understand
our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jérôme,
I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
non-free package are showing that they do not understand
our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
do
On 01/14/2002 10:05:52 AM af_mara wrote:
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's clear that free software is better than non-free software but
please
don't forget that you agreed that We will support our users who
develop
and run non-free software on Debian.
I'd like to remind that
Vince Mulhollon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I disagree with Jérôme Marant, with evidence supporting that disagreement
below:
This is strange that you did not even comment the first part
of my message.
--
Jérôme Marant
Hi Jérôme,
Le Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:04:10PM +0100, Jérôme Marant écrivait:
Hi,
I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
Sponsors are free to decide who they sponsor and what they sponsor.
There's no need for any new rule ...
May i let you know that when I packaged
I propose that we do not sponsor people for non-free packages.
[...]
People that we want to join us and seeking sponsors for
non-free package are showing that they do not understand
our philosophy and dedication to Free Software.
Debian *does* support non-free software --
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:41:31AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
it's unreasonable to have a nontechnical barrier to entry which doesn't
apply to existing members.
Agreed.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:05:52PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
I'm just telling that asking for a sponsor for non-free
packages is not helping the project.
If the package is useful it is helping the users.
I wonder if such people really know that Debian is not only about
technique
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 11:58:23PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 05:05:52PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
I'm just telling that asking for a sponsor for non-free
packages is not helping the project.
If the package is useful it is helping the users.
I wonder if
15 matches
Mail list logo
