[@ -legal: please cc me on reply as I'm not subscribed]
Hi folks,
We (Network UPS Tools project) are currently
looking at creating a complete documentation
set using docbook, for output formats and i18n
reasons.
This improvement in the upstream will, by side
effect, (re)create a nut-doc package in
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:49:38PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote:
Knowing that:
- NUT is a pure GPL project, thus we need a _free_
documentation licence,
So, what are your advices about choosing a _free_
documentation licence for NUT?
Why not use the GPL to cover the documentation as well?
Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[@ -legal: please cc me on reply as I'm not subscribed]
Hi folks,
We (Network UPS Tools project) are currently
looking at creating a complete documentation
set using docbook, for output formats and i18n
reasons.
That's great. Thanks.
This
3 matches
Mail list logo