Advices on choosing a documentation license for an upstream project

2003-11-04 Thread Arnaud Quette
[@ -legal: please cc me on reply as I'm not subscribed] Hi folks, We (Network UPS Tools project) are currently looking at creating a complete documentation set using docbook, for output formats and i18n reasons. This improvement in the upstream will, by side effect, (re)create a nut-doc package in

Re: Advices on choosing a documentation license for an upstream project

2003-11-04 Thread Chad Walstrom
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:49:38PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote: Knowing that: - NUT is a pure GPL project, thus we need a _free_ documentation licence, So, what are your advices about choosing a _free_ documentation licence for NUT? Why not use the GPL to cover the documentation as well?

Re: Advices on choosing a documentation license for an upstream project

2003-11-04 Thread Brian T. Sniffen
Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [@ -legal: please cc me on reply as I'm not subscribed] Hi folks, We (Network UPS Tools project) are currently looking at creating a complete documentation set using docbook, for output formats and i18n reasons. That's great. Thanks. This