: Nils Rennebarth [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 1997 11:03 AM
To:Michael Meskes
Cc:Die Adresse des Empfängers ist unbekannt.
Subject: Re: Anyone using transparent proxying?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote:
The title almost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote:
The title almost says it all. I just upgraded to pre-patch-2.0.31-2, but it
seems transparent proxying still doesn't work. My first rule says:
acc/r tcp anywhere anywhere any - www = tproxy
I
2.0.31-2 does redirect traffic but does not change the port number. I am really
getting sick of the way the 2.0.X series is handled. There are buggy releases
but no
fixed releases coming. I am considering moving to 2.1.X but then 2.1.X does not
have all
the features 2.0.X has. What a crazy
The title almost says it all. I just upgraded to pre-patch-2.0.31-2, but it
seems transparent proxying still doesn't work. My first rule says:
acc/r tcp anywhere anywhere any - www = tproxy
but still tproxy does not get the connection. I tried to trace it but it
appears
On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Michael Meskes wrote:
The title almost says it all. I just upgraded to pre-patch-2.0.31-2, but it
seems transparent proxying still doesn't work. My first rule says:
acc/r tcp anywhere anywhere any - www = tproxy
but still tproxy does not get
5 matches
Mail list logo
