Re: Archive changes - indices compression and checksums

2016-11-13 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14490 March 1977, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>as started in March[1] we have just adjusted unstable to no longer >>generate gzip compressed Packages/Sources files. We plan to wait about a >>week before adjusting testing too. >>Additionally we turned off SHA1 checksums for the (In)Release files for

Re: Archive changes - indices compression and checksums

2016-11-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 01:52:20PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >Hi > >as started in March[1] we have just adjusted unstable to no longer >generate gzip compressed Packages/Sources files. We plan to wait about a >week before adjusting testing too. > >Additionally we turned off SHA1 checksums for

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-20 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 14247 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > I've just activated a few changes to the archive we talk(ed) about for a > long time. And while it is not exactly the start of this release cycle, > it should still work out nicely (so one hopes). Tuesday to now - i think the majority of what breaks

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-19 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
3 against ftp.d.o to track the archive changes. Please report individual bugs against the services that are broken as a consequence of the archive changes, and mark the above bug as blocked by those new bugs. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . z...@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > As of now, InRelease/Release files, Packages and Sources no longer > provide MD5Sum and SHA1sums, only SHA256. FYI the lack of the "Files" field (having only Checksums-Sha256) in Sources broke the update procedure of tracker.debian.org... >

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-19 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi Joerg On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:26:30AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Also, from reading the current replies, noone has a problem with > removing sha1, so that one seems a set thing. md5 and gz files > removals make people more happy. I'm currently checking if there are places in d-i which

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-19 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 2016-03-16 22:20, Johannes Schauer wrote: Hi, Quoting Bill Allombert (2016-03-16 10:30:58) On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:15:16PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Additionally I turned off generating gzip compressed versions of those > files, xz is there. Does all services that read Packages

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-19 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi, Quoting Bill Allombert (2016-03-16 10:30:58) > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:15:16PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Additionally I turned off generating gzip compressed versions of those > > files, xz is there. > > Does all services that read Packages files handle xz already ? dose3 consumes

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-19 Thread Josh Triplett
Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 15:32:40 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:15:16PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > I've just activated a few changes to the archive we talk(ed) about for a > > > long time. And while it is not exactly the start of this release

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-16 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > As of now, InRelease/Release files, Packages and Sources no longer > > > provide MD5Sum and SHA1sums, only SHA256. Steve McIntyre wrote: > > We can't fix this easily in a short > > timescale - current released jigdo clients (both in Debian and > > externally) use

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-16 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 15:32:40 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:15:16PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > I've just activated a few changes to the archive we talk(ed) about for a > > long time. And while it is not exactly the start of this release cycle, > > it should

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-16 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Am 2016-03-16 01:20, schrieb Steve McIntyre: I've just activated a few changes to the archive we talk(ed) about for a long time. And while it is not exactly the start of this release cycle, it should still work out nicely (so one hopes). As of now, InRelease/Release files, Packages and

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-16 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Am 2016-03-16 08:32, schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli: >To test it, this is limited to experimental. We hope nothing breaks on it, >but lets try for a few days. If that works out, we should adjust >unstable, and another short time later coordinate with the release team >to adjust testing, so it ends

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Additionally I turned off generating gzip compressed versions of those > files, xz is there. This has broken some things, at least buildd status pages, DDPO, qadb ftp-update, sources.d.n. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-16 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:20:43AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >To test it, this is limited to experimental. We hope nothing breaks on it, > >but lets try for a few days. If that works out, we should adjust > >unstable, and another short time later coordinate with the release team > >to adjust

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-15 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:15:16PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >Hi, > >I've just activated a few changes to the archive we talk(ed) about for a >long time. And while it is not exactly the start of this release cycle, >it should still work out nicely (so one hopes). > >As of now, InRelease/Release

Re: Archive changes

2016-03-15 Thread Josh Triplett
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:15:16PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Hi, > > I've just activated a few changes to the archive we talk(ed) about for a > long time. And while it is not exactly the start of this release cycle, > it should still work out nicely (so one hopes). > > As of now,