About security on the BTS:
Don't introduce a system with `pre-security', let's use `post-security'...
what do I mean? The following: Make every action undoable and advertised,
e.g.: if someone manipulates a bug in any way the maintainer gets an email.
I think that that's how it's working now,
Previously Darren Benham wrote:
- Forwarded message from Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
| And do what... there are going to be keys that aren't in the debian
keyring..
The reason I mentioned this on a bugreport was that it would be very
easy to check if a signature is correct if
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:35:06AM -0700, Darren Benham wrote:
| And do what... there are going to be keys that aren't in the debian
keyring..
Non-developpers should not be allowed to *manipulate* bugs IMO.
What do you think?
Make me PGP/GPG/whatever sign all messages I send to
What do you think?
- Forwarded message from Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On 21/09, Darren Benham wrote:
| And do what... there are going to be keys that aren't in the debian keyring..
Non-developpers should not be allowed to *manipulate* bugs IMO.
- End forwarded message
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:35:06 -0700, Darren Benham wrote:
- Forwarded message from Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Non-developpers should not be allowed to *manipulate* bugs IMO.
It would be nice to have a mechanism available to ensure this if there is
indeed abuse of the BTS by
Darren Benham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do you think?
well, for one, the submitter doesn't have to be a developer, and it's
perfectly ok for the submitter to manipulate his bugs. I've always
thought the rule only the maintainer and the submitter are allowed to close
bugs to be a good
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:35:06AM -0700, Darren Benham was heard to say:
What do you think?
- Forwarded message from Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On 21/09, Darren Benham wrote:
| And do what... there are going to be keys that aren't in the debian
keyring..
| As a non-developer who has manipulated bugs..
[...]
| a bug anymore and should be closed. However, in a few cases I never got a
| response from the maintainer and decided to just close a bug myself.
[...]
| Are these shooting offenses? If so, I guess I should start keeping an eye
| out
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 06:23:27PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
Of course not, but only the package maintainer is supposed to close bugs on
her package. Even other Debian developers should use the fixed state.
Unless somebody's changed something while I wasn't looking, Debian accepts
9 matches
Mail list logo
