On 2016-11-29 13:08:54, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2016-11-28 23:07, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > On 2016-11-27 20:42:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > >* The bug should be of severity "important" or higher
> >
> > Quick question: assuming all the other conditions are met (minimal
> > patch,
> > clean
On 2016-11-28 23:07, Iustin Pop wrote:
On 2016-11-27 20:42:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
* The bug should be of severity "important" or higher
Quick question: assuming all the other conditions are met (minimal
patch,
clean debdiff, etc.), this seems to discourage normal bugs fixing. Is
that
On 11/29/2016 12:07 AM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On 2016-11-27 20:42:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>* The bug should be of severity "important" or higher
>
> Quick question: assuming all the other conditions are met (minimal patch,
> clean debdiff, etc.), this seems to discourage normal bugs fixing.
On 2016-11-28 23:43, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:11:17PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2016-11-28 14:38, Holger Levsen wrote:
> thanks for this update!
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:42:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >* The update must be built in an (old)stable
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:11:17PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2016-11-28 14:38, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > thanks for this update!
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:42:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > >* The update must be built in an (old)stable environment or chroot
> >
> > afaik
On 2016-11-27 20:42:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>* The bug should be of severity "important" or higher
Quick question: assuming all the other conditions are met (minimal patch,
clean debdiff, etc.), this seems to discourage normal bugs fixing. Is
that intentional (i.e. there must be
On 11/28/2016 05:18 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:47:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> source only uploads work for stretch and up. There are no arch:all
>> autobuilders for wheezy and jessie.
>
> Well, it doesn't even work for stretch, actually.
> There are no
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:47:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> source only uploads work for stretch and up. There are no arch:all
> autobuilders for wheezy and jessie.
ic. does that mean than arch:any only uploads work for wheezy+jessie?
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:47:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> source only uploads work for stretch and up. There are no arch:all
> autobuilders for wheezy and jessie.
Well, it doesn't even work for stretch, actually.
There are no autobuilders for stretch, and dak is rejecting such
uploads.
On 11/28/2016 02:38 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> thanks for this update!
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:42:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>* The update must be built in an (old)stable environment or chroot
>
> afaik source only uploads work as well, dont they? (and
On 2016-11-28 14:38, Holger Levsen wrote:
thanks for this update!
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:42:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
* The update must be built in an (old)stable environment or chroot
afaik source only uploads work as well, dont they? (and technically the
above obviously
Hi Adam,
thanks for this update!
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:42:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>* The update must be built in an (old)stable environment or chroot
afaik source only uploads work as well, dont they? (and technically the
above obviously includes this, but I think it would
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org (2015-05-27):
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:47:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 19:42:48 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 25/05/15 18:24, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:27:47 Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:28:38AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org (2015-05-27):
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:47:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 19:42:48 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 25/05/15 18:24, Lisandro Damián Nicanor
* Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org, 2015-05-27, 10:12:
Maybe dak should refuse uploads of a _$arch.changes file that does not
refer to any _$arch.deb files with an appropriate error message? Then
this isn't an issue.
What about packages that produce only arch:all binaries?
dpkg-buildpackage
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:47:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 19:42:48 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 25/05/15 18:24, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:27:47 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[snip]
Due to the way that the archive
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:37:09PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org, 2015-05-27, 10:12:
Maybe dak should refuse uploads of a _$arch.changes file that does not
refer to any _$arch.deb files with an appropriate error message? Then this
isn't an issue.
What about
* Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org, 2015-05-27, 12:53:
Maybe dak should refuse uploads of a _$arch.changes file that does
not refer to any _$arch.deb files with an appropriate error message?
Then this isn't an issue.
What about packages that produce only arch:all binaries?
dpkg-buildpackage
Hi,
On 05/26/2015 04:13 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2015-05-26 15:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
Perhaps the infrastructure could use something which doesn't clash with
real person usages, e.g. _$arch-buildd.changes perhaps?
I believe dak has been changed to not care about the file name, but this
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 20:47 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 19:42:48 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 25/05/15 18:24, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:27:47 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[snip]
Due to the way that the archive manages
On 2015-05-26 15:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
[...]
Perhaps the infrastructure could use something which doesn't clash with
real person usages, e.g. _$arch-buildd.changes perhaps?
(Eventually I mean).
Ian.
Hi,
I believe dak has been changed to not care about the file name, but this
On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:27:47 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[snip]
Due to the way that the archive manages uploads to proposed-updates, if
you upload a .changes file which only includes source and
architecture:all packages, please ensure that you rename it to something
other than _$arch.changes.
On 25/05/15 18:24, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:27:47 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[snip]
Due to the way that the archive manages uploads to proposed-updates, if
you upload a .changes file which only includes source and
architecture:all packages, please ensure
On Monday 25 May 2015 19:42:48 Simon McVittie wrote:
[snip]
Post-jessie devscripts has mergechanges -f -i for source+all uploads,
which amalgamates source, arch-dep and/or arch-indep changes into
foo_1.2-3_multi.changes, discarding any arch-dep binaries. For instance
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 19:42:48 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 25/05/15 18:24, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:27:47 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[snip]
Due to the way that the archive manages uploads to proposed-updates, if
you upload a .changes file
25 matches
Mail list logo
