Hi,
On Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 12:31:23 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For the second point, armel must keep up-to-date and must not have
build failures affecting armel. The current buildds are struggling to
keep upto date, so 4 new Thecus machines
[Sune Vuorela]
My impression of the state of armeb fits quite well with a 500 result
Almost, but not quite. There are four machines reporting to
popcon.debian.org. :)
This is the latest architecture distribution list as reported to
popcon.debian.org:
2 0.00% i486
2 0.00%
Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For the second point, armel must keep up-to-date and must not have
build failures affecting armel. The current buildds are struggling to
keep upto date, so 4 new Thecus machines have now been ordered to be set
up as normal/testing/security buildds and
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 11:39:24PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Now that armel is becoming official, could someone involved with the port
please look at updating the info about the port on the website [1] in the
run-up to Lenny?
Yeah, I sent a update for that page earlier, but it seems to have
On Thursday 06 March 2008, Riku Voipio wrote:
As you may have noticed, a new architecture, armel, has been added to
Debian. Here are some highlights and a bit of information in a nutshell.
For more details, refer to the wiki pages[0].
Now that armel is becoming official, could someone involved
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 12:15:09AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
Hello dear developers,
As you may have noticed, a new architecture, armel, has been added to
Debian. Here are some highlights and a bit of information in a nutshell.
For more details, refer to the wiki pages[0].
Can someone give
On 2008-03-06, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 12:15:09AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
Hello dear developers,
As you may have noticed, a new architecture, armel, has been added to
Debian. Here are some highlights and a bit of information in a nutshell.
For more
7 matches
Mail list logo
