On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 01:42, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Sure, but geramik is the source package name. There will be a
> gtk-engines-geramik, gtk2-engines-geramik and geramik-data.
Ok, good. Hm, I wonder if we should extend the format of the ITP to
have something like:
Source: geramik
Binaries:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 06:09, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:08, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: geramik
> > Description
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:08, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: geramik
> Description : A GTK theme which imitates the KDE 3.1 look
This package should follow the naming scheme for GTK+ 2 theme en
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: geramik
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Craig Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=3952
* License : GPL
Description
4 matches
Mail list logo