Re: Bug#172419: (no subject)

2002-12-10 Thread Colin Walters
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 01:42, Stefan Schimanski wrote: > Sure, but geramik is the source package name. There will be a > gtk-engines-geramik, gtk2-engines-geramik and geramik-data. Ok, good. Hm, I wonder if we should extend the format of the ITP to have something like: Source: geramik Binaries:

Re: Bug#172419: (no subject)

2002-12-10 Thread Stefan Schimanski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 10 December 2002 06:09, Colin Walters wrote: > On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:08, Stefan Schimanski wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > * Package name: geramik > > Description

Re: Bug#172419: (no subject)

2002-12-09 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:08, Stefan Schimanski wrote: > Package: wnpp > Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09 > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: geramik > Description : A GTK theme which imitates the KDE 3.1 look This package should follow the naming scheme for GTK+ 2 theme en

Bug#172419: (no subject)

2002-12-09 Thread Stefan Schimanski
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-09 Severity: wishlist * Package name: geramik Version : 0.12 Upstream Author : Craig Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=3952 * License : GPL Description