On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:12:06 -0400, Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I understand that debian-legal acts in an advisory capacity, and is
>> very useful to maintainers who need advice on licensing issues. And
>> I shall stipulate that the
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:15:13AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >I am closing the bug again. You can, or course, call for the
> > tech ctte to override this, or a GR, or get me removed from the
> > project, as you wish.
>
> I fully support y
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I am closing the bug again. You can, or course, call for the
> tech ctte to override this, or a GR, or get me removed from the
> project, as you wish.
I fully support your position on this.
When a law makes the majority of the population gui
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 10:31:59AM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:40:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>I did. I feel my packages are not buggy, lacking a position
> >> statement by the project.
> >
> > So, what
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:39:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> This decision to exclude GNU documentation from Debian, given
> the sheer volume of GNU software in Debian, is likely to be
> controversial. And we need to have a common stance on this issue. If
> this is all so very obvi
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:40:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I did. I feel my packages are not buggy, lacking a position
>> statement by the project.
>
> So, what we ship in main shall not be a function of whether the works in
> it are D
On Friday, 26 Sep 2003 09:43:26 -0500, Steve Langasek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:39:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:20:21 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> s
> >I understand that debian-legal acts in an advisory capacity,
>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:40:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I did. I feel my packages are not buggy, lacking a position
> statement by the project.
So, what we ship in main shall not be a function of whether the works in
it are DFSG-free or not, but shall instead depend on whether o
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that debian-legal acts in an advisory capacity,
> and is very useful to maintainers who need advice on licensing
> issues. And I shall stipulate that there is a rough consensus on
> debian-legal about the GFDL.
Right. There is co
reopen 212525
tags 212525 sarge-ignore
thanks
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:39:01PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:20:21 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> I understand that debian-legal acts in an advisory capacity,
> and is very useful to mainta
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:20:21 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Hi, On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 02:00:42 -0400, Nathanael Nerode
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>> This package contains material licensed under the GNU FDL (the
>>> manual) installed in usr/share/i
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:41:53 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Don't bother reopening these reports, they shall be just as
>> summarily closed.
> Feel free to modify the severity; I simply set it according to
> policy to start with. :-P
I di
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Don't bother reopening these reports, they shall be just as
summarily closed.
Feel free to modify the severity; I simply set it according to policy to
start with. :-P
There's nothing wrong with asking upstream to change its license (and I
wish you luck). The si
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 02:00:42 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
This package contains material licensed under the GNU FDL (the
manual) installed in usr/share/info/make.info*.gz. Debian-legal has
determined that the GNU FDL is not a free software licens
14 matches
Mail list logo
