[ Removing the Cc for the bug, adding -policy, and setting M-F-T, as this ]
[ is really a policy question.]
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 11:45:57AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Matthew Palmer wrote:
If I do 'man ls' I can get the semantics for the ls command.
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Martin Schulze wrote:
Adrian von Bidder wrote:
You wouldn't need to change every script - you just need to move
gettext.sh to /usr/share/gettext/scripts and create /usr/bin/gettext.sh
with the content Sean suggested.
Which buys us what?
This new gettext.sh
Matthew Palmer wrote:
If I do 'man ls' I can get the semantics for the ls command. No
such benefit is provided me by gettext.sh. Hmm, time to report a bug
against gettext-base for not having a manual page for gettext.sh...
I realize that you're probaly using that example as a rhetorical
ma, 2005-01-31 kello 14:24 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti:
Dude, PATH is for programs; gettext.sh is a shell library. It doesn't
really matter that . happens to search PATH for shell libraries --
unless they also happen to be binaries, PATH is just not an appropriate
place for libraries.
ma, 2005-01-31 kello 13:21 +0200, Lars Wirzenius kirjoitti:
ma, 2005-01-31 kello 14:24 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti:
Dude, PATH is for programs; gettext.sh is a shell library. It doesn't
really matter that . happens to search PATH for shell libraries --
unless they also happen to be
Santiago Vila wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Because I don't wanna play by the rules! is not a rationale.
You are mistaken. I want to play by the rules, but the rules say
executables should go to /usr/bin, *not* that everything in /usr/bin
should be executable.
It also says that
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Because I don't wanna play by the rules! is not a rationale.
You are mistaken. I want to play by the rules, but the rules say
executables should go to /usr/bin, *not* that everything in /usr/bin
should be executable.
So you have to specify a path --
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:28:53AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Because I don't wanna play by the rules! is not a rationale.
You are mistaken. I want to play by the rules, but the rules say
executables should go to /usr/bin, *not* that everything
8 matches
Mail list logo
