On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 08:33:23PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Those are real libraries that were not stripped, and those should
go away in favour of the detached version.
[Yes, I realize this is a really old thread... I haven't been reading
-devel lately.
Not necessarily true.
- They may be
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 04:21:29PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
- They may be compiled with lower optimization.
- They may be compiled with behavior-altering debugging options.
Yes: One has a crash, tries a debug version of a library and
suddenly everything behaves totally different, e.g. no
Steve Langasek wrote:
Sorry, you're completely wrong. The files installed in
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib are detached symbol files, that are loaded
automatically by gdb -- *not* using LD_LIBRARY_PATH; and gdb looks for
detached symbol files by prepending /usr/lib/debug to the full path of the
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:12:04PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Sorry, you're completely wrong. The files installed in
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib are detached symbol files, that are loaded
automatically by gdb -- *not* using LD_LIBRARY_PATH; and gdb looks for
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 12:19:07AM +, Darren Salt wrote:
I've noticed that several files which should be in /usr/lib/debug are in fact
in /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib. Checking via packages.d.o shows that as well as
this, debug data is showing up in /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin and
/usr/lib/debug/lib.
5 matches
Mail list logo
