On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:11:59PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2006-01-29 Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: libpcre3
Version: 6.4-1.1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to see libpcre.so* installed in /lib so that the -P
option in grep can be enabled. See also bugs #238237,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 07:25:25PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:11:59PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2006-01-29 Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: libpcre3
Version: 6.4-1.1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to see
On Jul 22, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of moving libpcre and making it quasi-essential, why not
slightly modify grep so that it can dlopen libpcre if present. Not
Since grep is already modular this would be very easy to implement by
moving the Pcompile() and Pexecute()
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 12:27:16PM +0200, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jul 22, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of moving libpcre and making it quasi-essential, why not
slightly modify grep so that it can dlopen libpcre if present. Not
Since grep is already modular
* Mike Hommey [Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:34:21 +0200]:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 12:27:16PM +0200, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Scripts using -P would need to depend on libcpre.
But packages including such scripts and not depending on libpcre would
be difficult to find...
Since grep has
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 11:48:52AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 07:25:25PM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 07:11:59PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2006-01-29 Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: libpcre3
Re: Marco d'Itri 2006-07-22 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Instead of moving libpcre and making it quasi-essential, why not
slightly modify grep so that it can dlopen libpcre if present. Not
Since grep is already modular this would be very easy to implement by
moving the Pcompile() and Pexecute()
7 matches
Mail list logo
