Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You won't be able to stay away from tcl/tk for too long if you want GUIs,
>
> Huh? My desktop is 100% tk-free...
Yeah, me too; I actually use that as one criterion to decide whether I
really want to install some random borderline useful utility... :-)
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 12:46:30AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > Not so fast. If the light weight system is to be kept as small as
> > possible, the additional tcl/Tk libraries would not be welcomed.
> You won't be able to stay away from tcl
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Not so fast. If the light weight system is to be kept as small as
> possible, the additional tcl/Tk libraries would not be welcomed.
You won't be able to stay away from tcl/tk for too long if you want GUIs,
but I see your point.
> GTK at least is common to
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 03:35 -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:07:45AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
>> > > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > >
>> > > > On Tue, 20
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can you all provide more information on
>
>> "too buggy that we refuse to support it"
>> full of malloc(FIXED_NUM)
>
>> So that I can take this to upstream. Is there improvements
>> that you would like to propose?
I noticed that later.
* Jari Aalto [Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:13:36 +0200]:
> The HELO argument may be funny,
It says something about the author.
> but the package seems to work okay. This list weight GUI version of
> sending mail (in contrast to console based ones; mutt etc.), is very
> small application that is suitabl
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 03:35 -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:07:45AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 01:16 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> The
ma, 2006-02-13 kello 23:00 +0100, Adeodato Simó kirjoitti:
> * Adeodato Simó [Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:58:24 +0100]:
>
> > And it may fall under the "too buggy that we refuse to support it"
>
> Ah, forgot to say that the code is, at least, full of malloc(FIXED_NUM),
> that afterwards get used w
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 03:35 -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:07:45AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 01:16 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > >>
> > >> The speciality is the small size + GUI to send mail. Usefu
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:07:45AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 01:16 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> >>
> >> The speciality is the small size + GUI to send mail. Useful for
> >> low end harware (166Mhz / 64 M mem).
> >
> > But that's j
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:58:24PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:39:25 -0200]:
>> Sure. People looking for git (see package git) and git (see package
>> git-core) will have yet another false positive: an [IMHO!] useless app that
>> duplicates fun
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 01:16 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
>>
>> The speciality is the small size + GUI to send mail. Useful for
>> low end harware (166Mhz / 64 M mem).
>
> But that's just it. It's for *sending* mail only. What is the
> purpose of a GUI for s
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 01:16 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Scripsit Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >>>From http://gitmail.sourceforge.net/ :
> >> This piece of software allows to send e-mails to any person
> >> over the net with a fake
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scripsit Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>>From http://gitmail.sourceforge.net/ :
>> This piece of software allows to send e-mails to any person
>> over the net with a fake email address, and also a fake name.
>
> Is this a feature, even? I
| * Adeodato Simó [Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:58:24 +0100]:
|
| > And it may fall under the "too buggy that we refuse to support it"
|
| Ah, forgot to say that the code is, at least, full of malloc(FIXED_NUM),
| that afterwards get used without any check for errors.
I've renamed the package to
* Adeodato Simó [Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:58:24 +0100]:
> And it may fall under the "too buggy that we refuse to support it"
Ah, forgot to say that the code is, at least, full of malloc(FIXED_NUM),
that afterwards get used without any check for errors.
--
Adeodato Simó
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:39:25 -0200]:
> Sure. People looking for git (see package git) and git (see package
> git-core) will have yet another false positive: an [IMHO!] useless app that
> duplicates functionality present in just about all useful, non-joke MUAs
> under t
Scripsit Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>From http://gitmail.sourceforge.net/ :
> This piece of software allows to send e-mails to any person
> over the net with a fake email address, and also a fake name.
Is this a feature, even? I should think all regular MUAs in Debian
happily allow
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:08 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: gitmail
> > Version : 0.4
> > Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 18:08 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: gitmail
> Version : 0.4
> Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gitmail
> * Li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gitmail
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gitmail
* License : GPL
Description : Very simple graphical mail user
21 matches
Mail list logo
