Re: Bug#368551: ITP: xml-security-c -- C++ library for XML Digital Signatures

2006-05-24 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Russ Allbery wrote: I'd really rather stick with the upstream name, particularly since this is Why not ask upstream WHY they are misnaming the library? libxml-security-c++ is a perfectly ok and valid name... -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk

Re: Bug#368551: ITP: xml-security-c -- C++ library for XML Digital Signatures

2006-05-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, 23 May 2006, Russ Allbery wrote: I'd really rather stick with the upstream name, Why not ask upstream WHY they are misnaming the library? libxml-security-c++ is a perfectly ok and valid name... I'll ask, but again, this is a

Bug#368551: ITP: xml-security-c -- C++ library for XML Digital Signatures

2006-05-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: xml-security-c Version : 1.2.1 Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://xml.apache.org/security/ * License : Apache 2.0 Programming Lang: C++

Re: Bug#368551: ITP: xml-security-c -- C++ library for XML Digital Signatures

2006-05-23 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:28:07PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: * Package name: xml-security-c Programming Lang: C++ Description : C++ library for XML Digital Signatures If it is a C++ library, please name the package xml-security-c++. If upstream names their tarballs

Re: Bug#368551: ITP: xml-security-c -- C++ library for XML Digital Signatures

2006-05-23 Thread Russ Allbery
Guus Sliepen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 05:28:07PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: * Package name: xml-security-c Programming Lang: C++ Description : C++ library for XML Digital Signatures If it is a C++ library, please name the package xml-security-c++. If