Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Note what packages fixed the problem in unstable, file an RC bug for the testing version and close it for the unstable version. That then reflects the reality and will keep track of the problem. Hm, I

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-17 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The second problem seems to be generic. The reason I looked at packages in testing was that they are the packages that are going to be released, and if I look at what's in unstable, it seems that I might miss what's going to be in etch (e.g.,

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-17 Thread Simon Josefsson
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The second problem seems to be generic. The reason I looked at packages in testing was that they are the packages that are going to be released, and if I look at what's in unstable, it seems that I

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 03:49:54PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: Note what packages fixed the problem in unstable, file an RC bug for the testing version and close it for the unstable version. That then reflects the reality and will keep track of the problem. Hm, I know how to submit a bug

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-16 Thread Andreas Barth
* Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]: I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files, and there may be false positives. If this is the case for your package, I'm sorry for the noise. Sorry, but that is unacceptable behaviour. Cheers, Andi --

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-16 Thread Simon Josefsson
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]: I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files, and there may be false positives. If this is the case for your package, I'm sorry for the noise. Sorry, but that is

Mass-filing RC bugs about IETF RFC license based on file name (Was: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's)

2006-10-16 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Simon Josefsson] Do you have suggestions to improve the situation? I would suspect manual inspection of each file, and only file bugs for the files with real license problems. Using the file name to guess about the existence of a serious bug is not acceptable. How many bugs did you file? A

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-16 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi Simon, On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:48:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]: I went over many packages looking for names of likely non-free files, and there may be false

Re: Bug#393411: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's

2006-10-16 Thread Simon Josefsson
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Simon, On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:48:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Simon Josefsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061016 13:19]: I went over many packages looking for names of